MacPherson Hugh, Schroer Sylvia
Department of Health Sciences, University of York, Heslington, York, United Kingdom.
Complement Ther Med. 2007 Jun;15(2):92-100. doi: 10.1016/j.ctim.2006.09.006. Epub 2006 Dec 11.
To standardise a complex intervention by defining the characteristic (specific) components of treatment for a randomised controlled trial of acupuncture as an intervention for individuals who have been diagnosed with depression using a consensus method.
A nominal group technique was used. Potential components of the acupuncture intervention were generated from the literature, experts and participants. These were categorised as constant or variable, the latter including active management techniques (such as providing relevant explanations), auxiliary techniques (such as auricular acupuncture), and other aspects of patient care (such as offering life-style and dietary advice), all of which were underpinned by defined theoretical frameworks. Participants were selected on the basis of their experience and training, to encompass a diverse range of styles of traditional acupuncture practice in the UK, and all rated components in two rounds.
Fifteen practitioners rated 52 variable components in the first round and 55 in the second. There was group support for 16 active management components, three auxiliary techniques and five areas of life-style support, all driven by eight theoretical diagnostic and treatment frameworks. For the 39 components that were rated twice, group support increased between rounds from 75 to 79% (z=-2.2, p=0.03), while the absolute average deviation from the median dropped from 1.04 to 0.83 (z=-2.5, p=0.011).
Standardising the characteristic components of a complex intervention for a randomised controlled trial of acupuncture for depression using a consensus approach is feasible. The method can be generalised to other clinical situations and other treatment modalities.
采用共识法,为一项针对已确诊为抑郁症个体的针刺随机对照试验确定治疗的特征(特定)组成部分,从而规范一种复杂干预措施。
采用名义小组技术。针刺干预的潜在组成部分来自文献、专家和参与者。这些被分为固定或可变部分,后者包括积极管理技术(如提供相关解释)、辅助技术(如耳针)以及患者护理的其他方面(如提供生活方式和饮食建议),所有这些都有明确的理论框架作为支撑。根据参与者的经验和培训情况进行选择,以涵盖英国传统针刺实践的多种不同风格,所有参与者在两轮中对各组成部分进行评分。
15名从业者在第一轮中对52个可变组成部分进行了评分,第二轮中对55个进行了评分。对于16个积极管理组成部分、3种辅助技术和5个生活方式支持领域得到了小组支持,所有这些都由8个理论诊断和治疗框架驱动。对于被评分两次的39个组成部分,两轮之间小组支持率从75%提高到79%(z = -2.2,p = 0.03),而与中位数的绝对平均偏差从1.04降至0.83(z = -2.5,p = 0.011)。
采用共识方法为抑郁症针刺随机对照试验规范复杂干预的特征组成部分是可行的。该方法可推广到其他临床情况和其他治疗方式。