Suppr超能文献

咪达唑仑与苯海拉明治疗胃复安所致静坐不能的随机对照试验。

Midazolam vs. diphenhydramine for the treatment of metoclopramide-induced akathisia: a randomized controlled trial.

作者信息

Parlak Ismet, Erdur Bulent, Parlak Mine, Ergin Ahmet, Ayrik Cuneyt, Tomruk Onder, Turkcuer Ibrahim, Ergin Nesrin

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, Dokuz Eylul University, Izmir, Turkey.

出版信息

Acad Emerg Med. 2007 Aug;14(8):715-21. doi: 10.1197/j.aem.2007.01.021. Epub 2007 May 31.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To compare the effects of midazolam, which is a fast and short-acting benzodiazepine, and diphenhydramine, which is a widely used anticholinergic agent, in clinical practice for the treatment of metoclopramide-induced akathisia.

METHODS

All adults older than 17 years given metoclopramide for nausea and vomiting or for headache and who had akathisia were eligible for this clinical, randomized, double-blind trial. Patients were randomized to receive diphenhydramine or midazolam. Subjective, objective, and total akathisia scores and modified Ramsay Sedation Scale scores were recorded. Repeated-measures analysis of variance was used to compare the efficacy and side effects of the medications.

RESULTS

Forty-one (73.3%) of the 56 enrolled patients were women. The mean (+/-SD) age was 39.9 (+/-15.7) years in the diphenhydramine group and 40.9 (+/-16.2) years in the midazolam group. Mean subjective, objective, and total akathisia scores in the first 5 minutes declined considerably in the midazolam group compared with the diphenhydramine group (p < 0.001). However, the mean Ramsay Sedation Scale score in the first 15 minutes increased significantly in the midazolam group compared with the diphenhydramine group (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Midazolam can correct the symptoms of metoclopramide-induced akathisia faster than diphenhydramine, but it causes more sedation.

摘要

目的

比较临床实践中,快速起效的短效苯二氮䓬类药物咪达唑仑和广泛使用的抗胆碱能药物苯海拉明治疗甲氧氯普胺所致静坐不能的效果。

方法

所有17岁以上因恶心、呕吐或头痛接受甲氧氯普胺治疗且出现静坐不能的成年人,均符合本临床随机双盲试验的条件。患者被随机分配接受苯海拉明或咪达唑仑治疗。记录主观、客观和总的静坐不能评分以及改良的Ramsay镇静评分。采用重复测量方差分析比较药物的疗效和副作用。

结果

56名入组患者中,41名(73.3%)为女性。苯海拉明组的平均(±标准差)年龄为39.9(±15.7)岁,咪达唑仑组为40.9(±16.2)岁。与苯海拉明组相比,咪达唑仑组在前5分钟的平均主观、客观和总的静坐不能评分显著下降(p<0.001)。然而,与苯海拉明组相比,咪达唑仑组在前15分钟的平均Ramsay镇静评分显著升高(p<0.001)。

结论

咪达唑仑比苯海拉明能更快纠正甲氧氯普胺所致静坐不能的症状,但会引起更多的镇静作用。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验