Suppr超能文献

水上和陆地跑步机运动期间的心肺反应峰值。

Peak cardiorespiratory responses during aquatic and land treadmill exercise.

作者信息

Silvers W Matthew, Rutledge Erin R, Dolny Dennis G

机构信息

Division of Health, Physical Education, Recreation, and Dance, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID 83844-2401, USA.

出版信息

Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2007 Jun;39(6):969-75. doi: 10.1097/mss.0b013e31803bb4ea.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Aquatic treadmill exercise has traditionally been used for aerobic training during rehabilitation; however, its ability to elicit comparable cardiorespiratory stress compared with land exercise is unclear. The purpose of this study was to investigate the cardiorespiratory (CR) responses elicited during maximal-effort protocols using an aquatic treadmill (ATM) and a land treadmill (TM).

METHODS

Twenty-three college runners participated in two continuous, incremental peak oxygen consumption protocols (ATM and TM) until volitional exhaustion. For the ATM protocol, subjects were submerged in 28 degrees C water to the xiphoid process. ATM speed was increased incrementally to 206.8+/-23.1 m.min, and water jet resistance was increased 10% every minute thereafter. For the TM protocol, speed was increased to 205.3+/-22.3 m.min, and grade was increased 2% every minute thereafter. Rest between sessions was at least 48 h. Oxygen consumption (VO2), heart rate (HR), minute ventilation (VE), tidal volume (VT), breathing frequency (f), and respiratory exchange ratio (RER) were measured continuously, with peak values used for analysis. Rating of perceived exertion (RPE) was recorded immediately after each test, and blood lactate (LA) was measured 3 min afterward.

RESULTS

VE and f were significantly greater in ATM versus TM; however, VO2, HR, VT, RER, LA, RPE, speed, and exercise times were similar for both protocols.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite differences in VE and f, it seems that the fluid resistance created by water and jets in an ATM elicits peak CR responses comparable with those seen with inclined TM. These findings suggest that ATM running may be as effective as TM running for aerobic conditioning in fit individuals.

摘要

目的

水上跑步机运动传统上用于康复期间的有氧训练;然而,与陆地运动相比,其引发相当的心肺应激的能力尚不清楚。本研究的目的是调查在使用水上跑步机(ATM)和陆地跑步机(TM)进行最大努力方案期间引发的心肺(CR)反应。

方法

23名大学跑步运动员参加了两项连续的、递增的最大摄氧量方案(ATM和TM),直至自愿疲劳。对于ATM方案,受试者被浸入28摄氏度的水中至剑突水平。ATM速度逐步增加至206.8±23.1米/分钟,此后水喷射阻力每分钟增加10%。对于TM方案,速度增加至205.3±22.3米/分钟,此后坡度每分钟增加2%。两次测试之间的休息时间至少为48小时。连续测量耗氧量(VO2)、心率(HR)、分钟通气量(VE)、潮气量(VT)、呼吸频率(f)和呼吸交换率(RER),使用峰值进行分析。每次测试后立即记录主观用力程度(RPE),并在3分钟后测量血乳酸(LA)。

结果

与TM相比,ATM中的VE和f显著更高;然而,两种方案的VO2、HR、VT、RER、LA、RPE、速度和运动时间相似。

结论

尽管VE和f存在差异,但ATM中的水和水流产生的流体阻力似乎引发了与倾斜TM相当的峰值CR反应。这些发现表明,对于健康个体的有氧训练,ATM跑步可能与TM跑步一样有效。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验