[What are we good at?].
作者信息
Goldenberg Saul
出版信息
Acta Cir Bras. 2007 May-Jun;22(3):160-1. doi: 10.1590/s0102-86502007000300001.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
[What are we good at?].我们擅长什么？
Acta Cir Bras. 2007 May-Jun;22(3):160-1. doi: 10.1590/s0102-86502007000300001.
2
Relation between online "hit counts" and subsequent citations: prospective study of research papers in the BMJ.在线“点击量”与后续引用之间的关系：《英国医学杂志》研究论文的前瞻性研究
BMJ. 2004 Sep 4;329(7465):546-7. doi: 10.1136/bmj.329.7465.546.
3
[Acta Cirúrgica Brasileira: from 2001 to 2005].
Acta Cir Bras. 2009 Jan-Feb;24(1):1-2. doi: 10.1590/s0102-86502009000100001.
4
[Why is it that Argentinean hepatologists do not publish enough?].为什么阿根廷肝病学家发表的文章不够多？
Acta Gastroenterol Latinoam. 2008 Mar;38(1):6-10.
5
Global productivity of dermatological research: a bibliometric analysis from 1985 to 2014.皮肤病学研究的全球生产力：1985年至2014年的文献计量分析
Br J Dermatol. 2017 Jan;176(1):234-236. doi: 10.1111/bjd.14802. Epub 2016 Oct 26.
6
Debates in medicine: global representation in medical discourse.医学领域的辩论：医学话语中的全球代表性
Lancet. 2014 Mar 1;383(9919):779. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60396-2.
7
Measuring research success via bibliometrics: where they fit and how they help and hinder.通过文献计量学衡量研究成果：其适用之处、作用及阻碍
J Adv Nurs. 2015 Dec;71(12):2699-701. doi: 10.1111/jan.12610. Epub 2014 Dec 23.
8
Cardiology in Brazilian scientific journals: an overview.巴西科学期刊中的心脏病学：概述
Rev Bras Cir Cardiovasc. 2012 Apr-Jun;27(2):302-11. doi: 10.5935/1678-9741.20120048.
9
Implications of findings of bibliometric analyses in parasitology.文献计量分析在寄生虫学领域研究结果的启示
Trends Parasitol. 2007 Jan;23(1):12-3. doi: 10.1016/j.pt.2006.10.004. Epub 2006 Nov 16.
10
[Evaluation of scientific production in different subareas of Public Health: limits of the current model and contributions to the debate].[公共卫生不同子领域的科研产出评估：当前模式的局限性及对辩论的贡献]
Cad Saude Publica. 2015 Oct;31(10):2137-47. doi: 10.1590/0102-311X00065515.
Zotero 插件