Salize Hans Joachim, Dressing Harald
Zentralinstitut für Seelische Gesundheit Mannheim, Mannheim.
Psychiatr Prax. 2007 Nov;34(8):388-94. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-970838. Epub 2007 Jun 1.
Internationally, there is a variety of approaches and concepts for placing and treating mentally disordered offenders in forensic-psychiatric care. European overviews are missing. Major indicators have not been standardized yet, which is a serious obstacle for cross-boundary comparisons.
Basic concepts, legal frameworks, service provision and prevalences in forensic care of 15 European Union Member States were assessed by an expert evaluation. Administrative data was compared and conclusions for a possible harmonization of approaches were drawn.
The placement and treatment of mentally disordered offenders in the European Union Member States is characterized by a considerable variety of concepts and practice routines. National health reporting standards and the quality of available administrative data is poor. On the basis of available information, models of good practice are hard to choose.
National and cross-boundary research should be intensified. Defining European quality and training standards in forensic psychiatry seems to be an activity to be started on a short term basis.
在国际上,对于将患有精神疾病的罪犯安置到法医精神病护理机构并进行治疗,存在多种方法和理念。目前尚缺乏欧洲方面的综述。主要指标尚未标准化,这严重阻碍了跨境比较。
通过专家评估,对15个欧盟成员国在法医护理方面的基本概念、法律框架、服务提供情况和患病率进行了评估。对行政数据进行了比较,并得出了关于可能统一方法的结论。
欧盟成员国在对患有精神疾病的罪犯的安置和治疗方面,呈现出相当多样化的理念和实践惯例。国家健康报告标准以及现有行政数据的质量较差。基于现有信息,很难选择出良好实践模式。
应加强国内和跨境研究。界定欧洲法医精神病学的质量和培训标准似乎是一项需要短期内启动的工作。