Mfinanga G S, Mutayoba B, Mbogo G, Kahwa A, Kimaro G, Mhame P P, Mwangi C, Malecela M N, Kitua A Y
Muhimbili Medical Research Centre, P.O. Box 3436, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Tanzan Health Res Bull. 2007 Jan;9(1):44-7. doi: 10.4314/thrb.v9i1.14291.
Tanzania is scaling up prevention, treatment, care and support of individuals affected with HIV. There is therefore a need for high quality and reliable HIV infection testing and AIDS staging. The objective of this study was to assess laboratories capacities of services in terms of HIV testing and quality control. A baseline survey was conducted from December 2004 to February 2005 in 12 laboratories which were conveniently selected to represent all the zones of Tanzania. The questionnaires comprised of questions on laboratory particulars, internal and external quality control for HIV testing and quality control of reagents. Source and level of customer satisfaction of HIV test kits supply was established. Of 12 laboratories, nine used rapid tests for screening and two used rapid tests for diagnosis. In the 12 laboratories, four used double ELISA and five used single ELISA and three did not use ELISA. Confirmatory tests observed were Western Blot in three laboratories, DNA PCR in two laboratories, CD4 counting in seven laboratories, and viral load in two laboratories. Although all laboratories conducted quality control (QC) of the HIV kits, only two laboratories had Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs). Internal and external quality control (EQC) was done at varied proportions with the highest frequency of 55.6% (5/9) for internal quality control (IQC) for rapid tests and EQC for ELISA, and the lowest frequency of 14.3% (1/ 7) for IQC for CD4 counting. None of the nine laboratories which conducted QC for reagents used for rapid tests and none of the five which performed IQC and EQC had SOPs. HIV kits were mainly procured by the Medical Store Department and most of laboratories were not satisfied with the delay in procurement procedures. Most of the laboratories used rapid tests only, while some used both rapid tests and ELISA method for HIV testing. In conclusion, the survey revealed inadequacy in Good Laboratory Practice and poor laboratory quality control process for HIV testing reagents, internal and external quality control.
坦桑尼亚正在扩大对感染艾滋病毒者的预防、治疗、护理和支持工作。因此,需要高质量且可靠的艾滋病毒感染检测及艾滋病分期。本研究的目的是评估各实验室在艾滋病毒检测及质量控制方面的服务能力。2004年12月至2005年2月,对12个实验室进行了基线调查,这些实验室是为代表坦桑尼亚所有区域而方便选取的。问卷包括有关实验室详情、艾滋病毒检测的内部和外部质量控制以及试剂质量控制的问题。确定了艾滋病毒检测试剂盒供应的客户满意度来源和水平。在12个实验室中,9个使用快速检测法进行筛查,2个使用快速检测法进行诊断。在这12个实验室中,4个使用双酶联免疫吸附测定法,5个使用单酶联免疫吸附测定法,3个不使用酶联免疫吸附测定法。观察到的确证检测方法有:3个实验室采用蛋白质印迹法,2个实验室采用DNA聚合酶链反应法,7个实验室采用CD4计数法,2个实验室采用病毒载量检测法。虽然所有实验室都对艾滋病毒检测试剂盒进行了质量控制(QC),但只有2个实验室有标准操作规程(SOPs)。内部和外部质量控制(EQC)的实施比例各不相同,快速检测的内部质量控制(IQC)和酶联免疫吸附测定法的外部质量控制的最高频率为55.6%(5/9),CD4计数的内部质量控制的最低频率为14.3%(1/7)。对用于快速检测的试剂进行质量控制的9个实验室中,没有一个实验室有标准操作规程,进行内部和外部质量控制的5个实验室中也没有一个有标准操作规程。艾滋病毒检测试剂盒主要由医疗用品供应部采购,大多数实验室对采购程序的延迟不满意。大多数实验室仅使用快速检测法,而一些实验室同时使用快速检测法和酶联免疫吸附测定法进行艾滋病毒检测。总之,调查显示在良好实验室规范方面存在不足,艾滋病毒检测试剂的实验室质量控制过程以及内部和外部质量控制较差。