Kodra Y, Morosini P R, Petrigliano R, Agazio E, Salerno P, Taruscio D
National Centre Rare Diseases, Department of Cell Biology and Neurosciences, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Rome, Italy.
Ann Ig. 2007 Mar-Apr;19(2):153-60.
People suffering from rare diseases, independently of the condition, often experience the same problems in receiving adequate health and social care. It is not clear how these problems differ in severity among different diseases and in different countries and how they change in time. In the framework of the NEPHIRD (Network of Public Health Institutions on Rare Diseases), a European project, funded by DG-SANCO (EU Commission), an effort was made to develop a simple but comprehensive tool to show patients' and/or caregivers' opinions about the quality and accessibility of health and social services. The self-filled questionnaire asks how often patients or caregivers had both negative and positive experiences about the quality and accessibility of health and social services and their opinion on their improvement, on 5-level scales. A pilot survey was carried out in several European Countries among members of Myasthenia Gravis, Neurofibromatosis, Prader Willi and Rett Syndrome volunteers' associations. Descriptive and comparative analyses were performed using Stata and Epi Info 2000. In total, 302 questionnaires were completed in France, Italy, Romania, Spain, Turkey and United Kingdom during 2004-05. In general, respondents thought that health care accessibility was worse than quality, and that social care and legal provisions were worse than health care, with some differences among countries. For all diseases, and for both patients and caregivers, the most frequent reported positive experiences were health professionals' kindness and readiness to help (all medians ranged from 3 to 5). As for the efforts for improvement made by public services in the last three years, the opinions were generally favourable. This study has several limitations. However the assessment tool that has been developed has some innovative and interesting features and may be considered a useful attempt to compare patients' and caregivers' experiences for a range of different diseases, countries and services, with respect to a rare disease programme.
患有罕见病的人,无论病情如何,在获得足够的医疗和社会护理方面往往会遇到同样的问题。目前尚不清楚这些问题在不同疾病、不同国家之间的严重程度有何差异,以及它们如何随时间变化。在由欧盟委员会卫生与消费者总司资助的欧洲项目“罕见病公共卫生机构网络”(NEPHIRD)框架内,人们努力开发一种简单但全面的工具,以展示患者和/或护理人员对卫生和社会服务质量及可及性的看法。这份自填式问卷询问患者或护理人员对卫生和社会服务质量及可及性的负面和正面体验的频率,以及他们对改善这些服务的意见,采用五级量表。在几个欧洲国家对重症肌无力、神经纤维瘤病、普拉德-威利综合征和雷特综合征志愿者协会的成员进行了一项试点调查。使用Stata和Epi Info 2000进行描述性和比较性分析。2004年至2005年期间,法国、意大利、罗马尼亚、西班牙、土耳其和英国共完成了302份问卷。总体而言,受访者认为医疗服务的可及性比质量差,社会护理和法律规定比医疗服务差,不同国家之间存在一些差异。对于所有疾病以及患者和护理人员来说,最常报告的积极体验是医疗专业人员的友善和乐于助人(所有中位数在3到5之间)。至于公共服务在过去三年中为改善情况所做的努力,总体意见是积极的。本研究有几个局限性。然而,所开发的评估工具具有一些创新和有趣的特点,就罕见病项目而言,可被视为比较患者和护理人员在一系列不同疾病、国家和服务方面体验的有益尝试。