Suppr超能文献

输血相关急性肺损伤与白细胞反应性抗体

Transfusion-related acute lung injury and leucocyte-reacting antibodies.

作者信息

Zupanska B, Uhrynowska M, Michur H, Maslanka K, Zajko M

机构信息

Institute of Haematology and Blood Transfusion, Warsaw, Poland.

出版信息

Vox Sang. 2007 Jul;93(1):70-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1423-0410.2007.00920.x.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Transfusion-related acute lung injury (TRALI) is underdiagnosed and underreported. This is why we present cases suspected for TRALI, in which leucocyte antibodies were examined.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We analysed 44 patients with respiratory insufficiency, related to transfusion, who met criteria of acute lung injury (ALI). Lymphocyte and granulocyte antibodies were examined in donors and patients by six methods.

RESULTS

Based on recent trends, we divided patients into two groups: TRALI (without risk factors for ALI) and possible TRALI (with probable risk factors). The incidence of antibodies was 68.2%, the majority were human leucocyte antigen (HLA) class I and/or II, the minority were non-specific granulocyte antibodies; half of all detected antibodies, however, reacted with granulocytes. Antibodies were found in 17 donors (more often in TRALI than in possible TRALI) and in 19 patients (in four - suspected to be of the donor origin, which would diminish the number of antibodies to 15). In seven available cases, we observed cognate antigen and/or positive cross-match. In the majority of patients, TRALI occurred after transfusion of red cells, in 56.2%- stored above 14 days; all the units were non-leucoreduced. Lookback in two donors showed that transfusions in 20 patients did not result in reported TRALI, even in the patient with cognate antigen.

CONCLUSIONS

Our clinical observations suggest that to distinguish between TRALI and possible TRALI is difficult and the results are equivocal - it is worth considering whether it can be omitted. We have confirmed that antibodies are involved in TRALI, although their role is very complex. The role of stored red blood cells in the development of TRALI requires further observations in comparison with a control group of patients without TRALI.

摘要

背景与目的

输血相关急性肺损伤(TRALI)存在诊断不足和报告不足的情况。这就是我们呈现疑似TRALI病例的原因,其中对白细胞抗体进行了检测。

材料与方法

我们分析了44例与输血相关的呼吸功能不全且符合急性肺损伤(ALI)标准的患者。通过六种方法检测了供者和患者的淋巴细胞及粒细胞抗体。

结果

根据近期趋势,我们将患者分为两组:TRALI(无ALI危险因素)和可能的TRALI(有可能的危险因素)。抗体发生率为68.2%,大多数为人类白细胞抗原(HLA)Ⅰ类和/或Ⅱ类,少数为非特异性粒细胞抗体;然而,所有检测到的抗体中有一半与粒细胞发生反应。在17名供者中发现了抗体(TRALI组比可能的TRALI组更常见),在19名患者中发现了抗体(4名患者疑似抗体来自供者,这将使抗体数量减少至15个)。在7例可获得的病例中,我们观察到了同源抗原和/或阳性交叉配血。在大多数患者中,TRALI发生在输注红细胞后,56.2%的红细胞储存时间超过14天;所有单位均未进行白细胞滤除。对两名供者的回顾性调查显示,20名患者的输血未导致报告的TRALI,即使是在有同源抗原的患者中。

结论

我们的临床观察表明,区分TRALI和可能的TRALI很困难,结果也不明确——是否可以省略这一区分值得考虑。我们已经证实抗体与TRALI有关,尽管它们的作用非常复杂。与无TRALI的对照组患者相比,储存红细胞在TRALI发生中的作用需要进一步观察。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验