Cools Martine, Boter Marjan, van Gurp Ruud, Stoop Hans, Poddighe Pino, Lau Yun-Fai Chris, Drop Stenvert L S, Wolffenbuttel Katja P, Looijenga Leendert H J
Department of Pathology, Erasmus MC-University Medical Center Rotterdam, Josephine Nefkens Institute, 3000 DR Rotterdam, The Netherlnads.
Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2007 Aug;67(2):184-92. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2265.2007.02859.x. Epub 2007 Jun 4.
Gonadal karyotyping is considered a tool for increasing our knowledge of disturbed gonadal development in patients with gonadal dysgenesis and for estimating more accurately the risk for gonadoblastoma formation. The objective was to gain insight into the role of Y chromosome distribution in the histological heterogeneity of gonads of patients with gonadal dysgenesis.
Investigation of the possible relationship between peripheral blood karyotype, gonadal karyotype, morphological differentiation patterns of dysgenetic gonads and tumour formation.
In total 22 gonadal samples from 19 patients with gonadal dysgenesis (45,X/46,XY and variants n = 14; 46,XY: n = 3; 46,XX: n = 2) were examined.
Morphological examination and immunohistochemical staining for testis specific protein, Y encoded (TSPY) and fluorescent and nonfluorescent in situ hybridization directly on gonadal tissue.
No correlation was observed between peripheral blood karyotype and gonadal karyotype or between gonadal karyotype and the corresponding differentiation pattern. A Y-containing cell line in Sertoli cells was encountered no more frequently than were other cell types.
The distribution of the Y-containing cell line in peripheral blood is not a suitable indicator for predicting the histological differentiation pattern found in the gonads of patients with gonadal dysgenesis. The analysis of Y-containing cell lines in the gonads of such patients could be informative with regard to the specific characteristics of gonadal development in humans as compared to chimeric mouse models. Moreover, it is essential to understand the mechanisms underlying disturbed gonadogenesis in these patients. As the gonadal karyotype is not related to the encountered gonadal differentiation pattern, it does not allow prediction of the risk for gonadoblastoma formation.
性腺核型分析被认为是一种工具,可增进我们对性腺发育不全患者性腺发育紊乱的了解,并更准确地估计性腺母细胞瘤形成的风险。目的是深入了解Y染色体分布在性腺发育不全患者性腺组织学异质性中的作用。
研究外周血核型、性腺核型、发育异常性腺的形态分化模式与肿瘤形成之间的可能关系。
共检查了19例性腺发育不全患者的22个性腺样本(45,X/46,XY及其变异型14例;46,XY 3例;46,XX 2例)。
对性腺组织直接进行形态学检查、睾丸特异性蛋白Y编码(TSPY)的免疫组织化学染色以及荧光和非荧光原位杂交。
未观察到外周血核型与性腺核型之间或性腺核型与相应分化模式之间存在相关性。在支持细胞中发现含Y细胞系的频率并不高于其他细胞类型。
外周血中含Y细胞系的分布不是预测性腺发育不全患者性腺组织学分化模式的合适指标。与嵌合小鼠模型相比,对此类患者性腺中含Y细胞系的分析可能有助于了解人类性腺发育的特定特征。此外,了解这些患者性腺发生紊乱的潜在机制至关重要。由于性腺核型与所遇到的性腺分化模式无关,因此无法预测性腺母细胞瘤形成的风险。