Suppr超能文献

德国多结节性甲状腺肿的管理(帕皮隆,2005年):甲状腺专科医生和初级保健医生的治疗方法有差异吗?

Management of multinodular goiter in Germany (Papillon 2005): do the approaches of thyroid specialists and primary care practitioners differ?

作者信息

Dietlein M, Wegscheider K, Vaupel R, Schmidt M, Schicha H

机构信息

Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Cologne, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937 Cologne, Germany.

出版信息

Nuklearmedizin. 2007;46(3):65-75.

Abstract

AIM

Large-scale survey to focus on management of multinodular goiter and to compare the approaches of practitioners in primary care and thyroid specialists in Germany.

METHODS

Replies to a questionnaire were received from 2,191 practitioners and 297 thyroid specialists between June 1 and September 30, 2005. The hypothetical cases and their modifications described multinodular goiters of different sizes with and without toxic nodules.

RESULTS

In the workup, TSH determination and thyroid sonography were found to be standard procedures. Scintigraphy was selected by 80.2% of practitioners and 92.9% of specialists (p < 0.001), in preference to fine needle aspiration cytology (17.9% of practitioners and 34.5% of the specialists, p < 0.001). Only 6.1% of practitioners and 24.4% of specialists (p < 0.001) advocated calcitonin screening. Euthyroid multinodular goiter (50-80 ml) was treated medically by 67.1% of practitioners and 65.6% of specialists, the combination of levothyroxine with iodine being clearly preferred (54.5% of practitioners, 52.3% of specialists). For toxic nodular goiter the preference for radioiodine therapy was significantly higher (p < 0.001) among specialists (67.7%) than among practitioners (47.5%). Referral to surgery was recommended for cold nodules with negative cytology by 64.9% of practitioners and 73.5% of specialists (p = 0.004).

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment and diagnostic procedures are used to nearly the same extent in primary care and specialist institutions, but the opinions diverge over the issues of calcitonin screening and referral for radioiodine therapy.

摘要

目的

开展大规模调查,聚焦多结节性甲状腺肿的管理,并比较德国初级保健医生和甲状腺专科医生的治疗方法。

方法

2005年6月1日至9月30日期间,收到了2191名医生和297名甲状腺专科医生对问卷的回复。假设病例及其修改版本描述了不同大小的多结节性甲状腺肿,伴有或不伴有毒性结节。

结果

在检查中,促甲状腺激素(TSH)测定和甲状腺超声检查被视为标准程序。80.2%的医生和92.9%的专科医生选择了闪烁扫描法(p<0.001),而不是细针穿刺细胞学检查(17.9%的医生和34.5%的专科医生,p<0.001)。只有6.1%的医生和24.4%的专科医生(p<0.001)主张进行降钙素筛查。67.1%的医生和65.6%的专科医生对甲状腺功能正常的多结节性甲状腺肿(50 - 80毫升)进行药物治疗,左旋甲状腺素与碘联合使用明显更受青睐(54.5%的医生,52.3%的专科医生)。对于毒性结节性甲状腺肿,专科医生(67.7%)对放射性碘治疗的偏好明显高于医生(47.5%)(p<0.001)。64.9%的医生和73.5%的专科医生(p = 0.004)建议对细胞学检查为阴性的冷结节进行手术转诊。

结论

初级保健机构和专科机构在治疗和诊断程序的使用程度上几乎相同,但在降钙素筛查和放射性碘治疗转诊问题上存在意见分歧。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验