• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经腋窝隆胸的影响:乳腺癌发生的终生概率及前哨淋巴结定位干扰

Implications of transaxillary breast augmentation: lifetime probability of breast cancer development and sentinel node mapping interference.

作者信息

Prado Arturo, Andrades Patricio, Leniz Patricio

机构信息

Division of Plastic Surgery, School of Medicine, Clinical Hospital JJ Aguirre, University of Chile, Chile.

出版信息

Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2007 Jul-Aug;31(4):317-9. doi: 10.1007/s00266-006-0131-7.

DOI:10.1007/s00266-006-0131-7
PMID:17549559
Abstract

After the "fifth-generation" breast implants with ultracohesive silicone gel technology are introduced, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) will sooner or later retire the ban on the use of these devices in the United States. When this happens, the plastic surgery community must be prepared to face a massive demand for reoperations to change saline-filled breast implants because cohesive gel devices have the potential to provide a more natural breast shape, to minimize the risk of postoperative rippling, and to provide a greater degree of safety if the implant loses its integrity. Despite these advantages and extensive use throughout the rest of the world during the ban in the United States, silicone implants also have disadvantages. One drawback is that transaxillary breast augmentation with more "rigid" gel-filled implants may produce trauma to the armpit, may interfere with sentinel node mapping for breast cancer treatment, and may have future medicolegal implications.

摘要

随着采用超粘性硅胶凝胶技术的“第五代”乳房植入物问世,美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)迟早会取消在美国使用这些器械的禁令。届时,整形外科学界必须做好准备,迎接大量更换盐水填充乳房植入物的再次手术需求,因为粘性凝胶器械有可能塑造出更自然的乳房形状,将术后波纹风险降至最低,并且在植入物完整性受损时提供更高的安全性。尽管在美国禁令期间这些植入物在世界其他地区得到广泛使用且具有这些优点,但硅胶植入物也存在缺点。一个缺点是,使用更“硬”的凝胶填充植入物进行经腋窝隆胸可能会对腋窝造成创伤,可能会干扰乳腺癌治疗中的前哨淋巴结定位,并且可能会带来未来的法医学问题。

相似文献

1
Implications of transaxillary breast augmentation: lifetime probability of breast cancer development and sentinel node mapping interference.经腋窝隆胸的影响:乳腺癌发生的终生概率及前哨淋巴结定位干扰
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2007 Jul-Aug;31(4):317-9. doi: 10.1007/s00266-006-0131-7.
2
Re: implications of transaxillary breast augmentation: lifetime probability for the development of breast cancer and sentinel node mapping interference.
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2007 Jul-Aug;31(4):322-4. doi: 10.1007/s00266-006-0204-7.
3
Re: implications of transaxillary breast augmentation: lifetime probability for the development of breast cancer and sentinel node mapping interference.
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2007 Jul-Aug;31(4):320-1. doi: 10.1007/s00266-006-0203-8.
4
Allergan's silicone gel breast implants.艾尔建公司的硅胶凝胶乳房植入物。
Expert Rev Med Devices. 2007 Sep;4(5):699-708. doi: 10.1586/17434440.4.5.699.
5
Breast implant stability in the subfascial plane and the new shaped silicone gel breast implants.乳腺皮下植入物稳定性和新型硅凝胶乳房植入物。
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2010 Feb;34(1):23-28. doi: 10.1007/s00266-009-9429-6.
6
[Fibrosarcoma after silicone breast augmentation: is there a connection?].
Harefuah. 1998 Mar 1;134(5):339-41, 424.
7
Is hyaluronic acid gel a good option for breast augmentation?透明质酸凝胶是隆胸的好选择吗?
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2011 Feb;35(1):134-6; author reply 137. doi: 10.1007/s00266-010-9603-x. Epub 2010 Oct 17.
8
Transaxillary breast augmentation: two breast cancer patients with successful sentinel lymph node diagnosis.
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2007 Sep-Oct;31(5):544-9; discussion 550-2. doi: 10.1007/s00266-006-0260-z. Epub 2007 Jul 20.
9
The safety of silicone gel-filled breast implants: a review of the epidemiologic evidence.硅胶填充乳房植入物的安全性:流行病学证据综述
Ann Plast Surg. 2007 Nov;59(5):569-80. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0b013e318066f0bd.
10
Silicone breast implants: lessons from a saga.硅胶乳房植入物:一段传奇的教训。
Trans Am Clin Climatol Assoc. 2001;112:149-56; discussion 157.