Suppr超能文献

三种品牌的成品杀虫网以及常规用溴氰菊酯处理的蚊帐经反复洗涤后的昆虫学评估

Entomological evaluation of three brands of manufactured insecticidal nets and of nets conventionally treated with deltamethrin, after repeated washing.

作者信息

Kayedi M H, Lines J D, Haghdoost A A, Behrahi A, Khamisabadi K

机构信息

Disease Control and Vector Biology Unit, Department of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London WC1E 7HT, UK.

出版信息

Ann Trop Med Parasitol. 2007 Jul;101(5):449-56. doi: 10.1179/136485907X176481.

Abstract

The present study evaluated the efficacy and wash resistance of three types of commercial, deltamethrin-treated nets (PermaNet, Yorkool and A-Z nets) - that their manufacturers claimed to be long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLIN) - and those of nets conventionally treated with deltamethrin, at either 23-27 mg/m(2) (using one K-O Tab tablet/net) or 46-54 mg/m(2) (using two K-O Tab tablets/net). The nets were tested unwashed or after being washed, by hand or machine, five or 15 times. After each wash, the nets were dried vertically on a line, in the shade, for 8 h. Insecticidal activity was assessed, using two types of bio-assay and wild-caught female Anopheles stephensi, as mean median knock-down times and as mortality 24 h after a 3-min exposure. For each type of nets tested, the insecticidal activity of the unwashed nets was greater than that of the nets washed five washes, and that of the nets washed five times was greater than that of the nets washed 15 times, with the latter decline considerably greater than the former. The pattern of decrease, however, differed with net type. The PermaNet and A-Z nets generally had the highest insecticidal activity, and, overall, the Yorkool nets did not perform significantly better than the conventional nets treated with 23-27 mg deltamethrin/m(2). Although washing with detergents can clearly remove insecticide from the fibres of all types of treated nets, the consequent loss of activity varies with net type. After 15 washes, the PermaNet nets showed higher insecticidal activity than any other net type but there is still scope for the manufacturer of the PermaNet nets to improve wash resistance.

摘要

本研究评估了三种商业化的、经溴氰菊酯处理的蚊帐(长效蚊帐、优可蚊帐和A - Z蚊帐)——其制造商宣称这些蚊帐为长效驱虫蚊帐(LLIN)——以及经常规剂量溴氰菊酯处理的蚊帐(剂量分别为23 - 27毫克/平方米(每顶蚊帐使用1片K - O Tab片剂)或46 - 54毫克/平方米(每顶蚊帐使用2片K - O Tab片剂))的效果和耐洗性。这些蚊帐在未清洗时或经过手工或机器清洗5次或15次后进行测试。每次清洗后,蚊帐在阴凉处垂直挂在绳子上晾干8小时。使用两种生物测定方法和野外捕获的雌性斯氏按蚊,评估蚊帐的杀虫活性,测定平均击倒时间以及暴露3分钟后24小时的死亡率。对于所测试的每种蚊帐类型,未清洗蚊帐的杀虫活性高于清洗5次后的蚊帐,而清洗5次的蚊帐的杀虫活性高于清洗15次的蚊帐,且后者的活性下降幅度明显大于前者。然而,活性下降模式因蚊帐类型而异。长效蚊帐和A - Z蚊帐通常具有最高的杀虫活性,总体而言,优可蚊帐的表现并不明显优于用23 - 27毫克溴氰菊酯/平方米处理的常规蚊帐。虽然用洗涤剂清洗能明显去除所有类型处理蚊帐纤维上的杀虫剂,但由此导致的活性损失因蚊帐类型而异。清洗15次后,长效蚊帐的杀虫活性高于其他任何蚊帐类型,但长效蚊帐的制造商仍有提高耐洗性的空间。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验