• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Influence of local provision of specialty health care service on patient access to care.当地专科医疗服务的提供对患者获得医疗服务的影响。
Can J Surg. 2007 Apr;50(2):124-8.
2
Are there geographical disparities in access to liver transplantation in Atlantic Canada?加拿大大西洋地区在肝移植可及性方面存在地域差异吗?
Can J Gastroenterol. 2012 Oct;26(10):705-10. doi: 10.1155/2012/627239.
3
Local access to subspecialty care influences the chance of receiving a liver transplant.当地获得亚专科治疗的机会影响接受肝移植的机会。
Liver Transpl. 2013 Apr;19(4):377-82. doi: 10.1002/lt.23588. Epub 2013 Mar 17.
4
Service use for mental health reasons: cross-provincial differences in rates, determinants, and equity of access.因心理健康问题而使用服务的情况:跨省在使用率、决定因素及获得服务的公平性方面的差异。
Can J Psychiatry. 2005 Sep;50(10):614-9. doi: 10.1177/070674370505001007.
5
The Royal Free Hospital 'hub-and-spoke network model' delivers effective care and increased access to liver transplantation.皇家自由医院的“中心辐射型网络模式”提供了有效的护理,并增加了肝移植的可及性。
Public Health. 2018 Jan;154:164-171. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2017.10.012. Epub 2017 Dec 22.
6
Access to heart and liver transplantation in the late 1980s.20世纪80年代末心脏和肝脏移植的可及性。
Med Care. 1993 Nov;31(11):1027-42. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199311000-00005.
7
Secondary prevention after acute myocardial infarction in four Canadian provinces, 1997-2000.1997 - 2000年加拿大四个省份急性心肌梗死后的二级预防
Can J Cardiol. 2004 Jan;20(1):61-7.
8
Role of Patient Factors and Practice Patterns in Determining Access to Liver Waitlist.患者因素和实践模式在确定获得肝移植候补名单中的作用。
Am J Transplant. 2015 Jul;15(7):1836-42. doi: 10.1111/ajt.13301. Epub 2015 Apr 30.
9
Inequitable access for mentally ill patients to some medically necessary procedures.精神病患者在获得某些医疗必需程序方面存在不公平现象。
CMAJ. 2007 Mar 13;176(6):779-84. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.060482.
10
A comparison of disease severity and survival rates after liver transplantation in the United Kingdom, Canada, and the United States.英国、加拿大和美国肝移植后疾病严重程度及生存率的比较。
Liver Transpl. 2004 Jul;10(7):898-902. doi: 10.1002/lt.20138.

引用本文的文献

1
A patient-centred approach toward surgical wait times for colon cancer: a population-based analysis.以患者为中心的结肠癌手术等待时间方法:基于人群的分析。
Can J Surg. 2014 Apr;57(2):94-100. doi: 10.1503/cjs.026512.
2
Recipient ineligibility after liver transplantation assessment: a single centre experience.肝移植评估后受者不合格:单中心经验。
Can J Surg. 2013 Jun;56(3):E39-43. doi: 10.1503/cjs.004512.
3
Hepatic resection in Canada: rates and geographic variation.加拿大的肝切除术:手术率及地域差异
Can J Surg. 2009 Dec;52(6):E264-8.

本文引用的文献

1
Mapping choice in the NHS: cross sectional study of routinely collected data.英国国家医疗服务体系中的地图绘制选择:对常规收集数据的横断面研究
BMJ. 2005 Feb 5;330(7486):284. doi: 10.1136/bmj.330.7486.284.
2
Utility of MELD and Child-Turcotte-Pugh scores and the Canadian waitlisting algorithm in predicting short-term survival after liver transplant.终末期肝病模型(MELD)和Child-Turcotte-Pugh评分以及加拿大等待名单算法在预测肝移植后短期生存率方面的效用。
Clin Invest Med. 2004 Aug;27(4):162-7.
3
Transplantation in Canada: review of the last decade from the Canadian Organ Replacement Register.加拿大的移植情况:基于加拿大器官替代登记处对过去十年的回顾。
Clin Transpl. 2003:101-8.
4
Single-payer, universal health insurance: still sound after all these years.单一支付者的全民健康保险:历经岁月,依然合理。
CMAJ. 2004 Sep 14;171(6):600-1. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.1041286.
5
MDs worried about access to care, CMA survey indicates.加拿大医学会调查显示,医生担心医疗服务的可及性。
CMAJ. 2000 Oct 3;163(7):869.
6
A model to predict poor survival in patients undergoing transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts.预测经颈静脉肝内门体分流术患者生存预后不良的模型。
Hepatology. 2000 Apr;31(4):864-71. doi: 10.1053/he.2000.5852.

当地专科医疗服务的提供对患者获得医疗服务的影响。

Influence of local provision of specialty health care service on patient access to care.

作者信息

McAlister Vivian C

机构信息

Department of Surgery, University of Western Ontario, London, Ont., Canada.

出版信息

Can J Surg. 2007 Apr;50(2):124-8.

PMID:17550716
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2384260/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The impact of local provision of specialty service on patients' access to care was studied in Canada's 13 health care jurisdictions where distance may be a barrier limiting access.

METHODS

A cross-sectional study of routinely collected registry data in Ontario and Nova Scotia was performed. Liver transplant was chosen as an indicator service. Transplant rate, disease severity, urgency and outcome were studied in adult recipients of first liver transplants from 1993 to 2002. Provinces that provided liver transplants were compared with those that did not; Ontario regions that provided the service were compared with those that did not; and the period of time when liver transplants were available in Nova Scotia was compared with the time when they were not.

RESULTS

Use varied widely between jurisdictions but was consistently higher in provider provinces, at 10.9 per million population (pmp) compared with 8.9 pmp in nonprovider provinces (p < 0.005). Use was higher in district health councils of Ontario that provided transplantation. A larger proportion of patients in provider regions had viral or alcoholic etiologies of disease than did those from nonprovider regions, who tended to have superior survival after transplant. Service interruption in Nova Scotia did not change use rates, with transplant rates remaining above average, at 12.0 pmp.

CONCLUSIONS

Differences in use between provider and nonprovider regions may reflect local service availability as well as local patterns of disease and patient referral. Expectations of patients that are established by local service availability persist after service is removed.

摘要

引言

在加拿大13个医疗辖区研究了当地专科服务的提供对患者获得医疗服务的影响,在这些辖区距离可能是限制获得服务的障碍。

方法

对安大略省和新斯科舍省常规收集的登记数据进行横断面研究。选择肝移植作为指标服务。对1993年至2002年首次肝移植的成年受者的移植率、疾病严重程度、紧迫性和结局进行研究。将提供肝移植的省份与未提供的省份进行比较;将安大略省提供该服务的地区与未提供的地区进行比较;将新斯科舍省有肝移植服务的时间段与没有该服务的时间段进行比较。

结果

各辖区之间的使用率差异很大,但提供服务的省份的使用率一直较高,为每百万人口10.9例(pmp),而非提供服务的省份为每百万人口8.9例(p<0.005)。安大略省提供移植服务的地区卫生委员会的使用率更高。与非提供服务地区的患者相比,提供服务地区的患者中因病毒或酒精导致疾病的比例更大,非提供服务地区的患者移植后的生存率往往更高。新斯科舍省的服务中断并未改变使用率,移植率仍高于平均水平,为每百万人口12.0例。

结论

提供服务地区和非提供服务地区之间的使用率差异可能反映了当地服务的可及性以及当地的疾病模式和患者转诊情况。由当地服务可及性所形成的患者期望在服务取消后仍然存在。