Bain Roderick S, Rashed Arash, Cowper Verity J, Gilbert Francis S, Sherratt Thomas N
Department of Biology, Carleton University, 1125 Colonel By Drive, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1S 5B6.
Proc Biol Sci. 2007 Aug 22;274(1621):1949-54. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2007.0458.
Batesian mimicry occurs when a palatable species (the mimic) gains protection from predators by resembling an unpalatable or otherwise protected species (the model). While some mimetic species resemble their models closely, other species ('imperfect mimics') are thought to bear only a crude likeness. In an earlier study, pigeons (Columba livia) were trained to recognize wasp images in one experiment and non-mimetic (NM) fly images in another by rewarding the pigeons for pecking on the respective image types. These pigeons were subsequently presented with different images, including seemingly wasp-like hoverfly species, and the recorded peck rates on these images were used as a measure of the pigeons' perception of the hoverflies' mimetic similarity. To identify a candidate set of morphological features that the pigeons used when assessing this mimetic similarity, we first extracted a range of biometrical measurements from images originally presented to the pigeons. We then repeatedly optimized an empirical model in an attempt to match the recorded pigeon peck rates while using as few biometrical features as input as possible. Our models were able to fit the pigeon peck rates with considerable accuracy even while excluding many input features. Antennal length, a feature commonly used to discriminate between flies and wasps, was regularly retained as an input variable, but overall a different set of biometrical features was important for predicting the peck rates of pigeons rewarded for identifying wasps compared to those rewarded for identifying NM flies. In highlighting the importance of specific biometrical features in promoting mimicry and the irrelevance of others, our optimized models provide an explanation as to why certain species that appear to be poor mimics to humans are judged to be good mimics by birds.
贝氏拟态发生在一个可口的物种(模仿者)通过模仿一个不可口或受其他保护的物种(被模仿者)来获得免受捕食者侵害的保护时。虽然一些拟态物种与它们的被模仿者非常相似,但其他物种(“不完美模仿者”)被认为只是粗略地相似。在早期的一项研究中,鸽子(家鸽)在一个实验中被训练识别黄蜂图像,在另一个实验中被训练识别非拟态(NM)苍蝇图像,方法是奖励鸽子啄相应的图像类型。这些鸽子随后被展示不同的图像,包括看似黄蜂般的食蚜蝇物种,记录在这些图像上的啄击率被用作衡量鸽子对食蚜蝇拟态相似性的感知的指标。为了确定鸽子在评估这种拟态相似性时使用的一组候选形态特征,我们首先从最初展示给鸽子的图像中提取了一系列生物测量数据。然后,我们反复优化一个经验模型,试图在使用尽可能少的生物特征作为输入的同时,匹配记录的鸽子啄击率。即使排除了许多输入特征,我们的模型仍能以相当高的准确性拟合鸽子的啄击率。触角长度,一个常用于区分苍蝇和黄蜂的特征,经常被保留为输入变量,但总体而言,与识别NM苍蝇而获得奖励的鸽子相比,一组不同的生物特征对于预测识别黄蜂而获得奖励的鸽子的啄击率更为重要。在强调特定生物特征在促进拟态中的重要性以及其他特征的无关性时,我们优化后的模型解释了为什么某些对人类来说似乎是差劲模仿者的物种被鸟类判定为优秀的模仿者。