Lake Charles Ray, Hurwitz Nathaniel
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Kansas School of Medicine, Kansas City, Kansas 66160, USA.
Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2007 Jul;20(4):365-79. doi: 10.1097/YCO.0b013e3281a305ab.
Schizoaffective disorder was named as a compromise diagnosis in 1933, and remains popular as judged by its place in the International Classification of Diseases and the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, its frequent use in clinical practice, and its extensive discussion in the literature. Some, however, have questioned the validity of schizoaffective disorder as separate from psychotic mood disorder. We examined the literature to assess the rationale for the continuation of schizoaffective disorder as a legitimate diagnostic category.
The diagnosis of schizoaffective disorder depends on the disease specificity of the diagnostic criteria for schizophrenia; however, the psychotic symptoms for schizophrenia, traditionally held as specific, can be accounted for by psychotic bipolar. Further, the interrater reliability for diagnosing schizoaffective disorder is very low. A recent and expanding body of comparative evidence from a wide range of clinical and basic science studies, especially genetic, reveals multiple similarities between schizoaffective disorder, schizophrenia and psychotic bipolar.
Schizoaffective disorder unifies schizophrenia and bipolar, blurring the zones of rarity between them and suggesting that schizoaffective disorder is not a separate, 'bona-fide' disease. Patients diagnosed with schizoaffective disorder likely suffer from a psychotic mood disorder. The diagnosis of schizoaffective disorder, which can result in substandard treatment, should be eliminated from the diagnostic nomenclature.
分裂情感性障碍于1933年被命名为一种折衷诊断,从其在《国际疾病分类》和《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》中的位置、在临床实践中的频繁使用以及在文献中的广泛讨论来看,它仍然很常见。然而,有些人质疑分裂情感性障碍作为一种与精神病性心境障碍相分离的疾病的有效性。我们查阅了文献,以评估将分裂情感性障碍作为一个合理的诊断类别继续存在的理由。
分裂情感性障碍的诊断取决于精神分裂症诊断标准的疾病特异性;然而,传统上认为是精神分裂症特异性的精神病性症状可以由双相情感障碍伴精神病性症状来解释。此外,诊断分裂情感性障碍的评定者间信度非常低。最近,来自广泛的临床和基础科学研究,尤其是遗传学研究的越来越多的比较证据表明,分裂情感性障碍、精神分裂症和双相情感障碍伴精神病性症状之间存在多种相似之处。
分裂情感性障碍将精神分裂症和双相情感障碍统一起来,模糊了它们之间的罕见区域,这表明分裂情感性障碍不是一种独立的“真正的”疾病。被诊断为分裂情感性障碍的患者可能患有精神病性心境障碍。分裂情感性障碍的诊断可能导致治疗不达标,应从诊断术语中剔除。