Suppr超能文献

衡量性伴侣的同时性:关键在于缺失的部分。

Measuring sex partner concurrency: it's what's missing that counts.

作者信息

Nelson Sara J, Manhart Lisa E, Gorbach Pamina M, Martin David H, Stoner Bradley P, Aral Sevgi O, Holmes King K

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.

出版信息

Sex Transm Dis. 2007 Oct;34(10):801-7. doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0b013e318063c734.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Sex partner concurrency is an important determinant of STI transmission dynamics, yet its measurement is not standardized.

GOAL

: We assessed the agreement, compared correlates, and investigated data quality and completeness between 2 common concurrency measures.

STUDY DESIGN

Young adults (ages 18-26) attending public STD clinics between 2001 and 2004 in Seattle, St. Louis, and New Orleans, provided data on 2 or more sex partners in a computer-administered survey interview (N = 680). Concurrency with last partner was measured in 2 ways: (a) a direct question about other sexual contacts during the most recent sexual relationship and (b) overlapping start and end dates of the 2 most recent relationships.

RESULTS

Although 56% reported concurrency by direct questioning and 54% by overlapping dates, the kappa statistic for agreement between measures was only fair (0.395). Indeed, 29% of those reporting concurrent partners by the direct question did not do so by overlapping dates and 26% of participants concurrent by overlapping dates were not concurrent by the direct question. Each of the measures had dissimilar correlates, and concurrency data were missing or uninterpretable more often for the overlapping dates measure (21.3%) than the direct question (1.8%).

CONCLUSIONS

Concurrency was common by both measures but the measures were not interchangeable. Although the overlapping dates measure provided information about partnership duration, it is subject to missing or uninterpretable data. The direct question substantially minimized the amount of missing data and may be more appropriate for use with computer-administered survey interview.

摘要

背景

性伴侣同时交往是性传播感染传播动态的一个重要决定因素,但其测量方法尚未标准化。

目标

我们评估了两种常见同时交往测量方法之间的一致性,比较了相关因素,并调查了数据质量和完整性。

研究设计

2001年至2004年期间,在西雅图、圣路易斯和新奥尔良的公共性传播疾病诊所就诊的18至26岁的年轻人,在计算机辅助的调查访谈中提供了关于两个或更多性伴侣的数据(N = 680)。与最后一个伴侣的同时交往情况通过两种方式进行测量:(a)一个关于最近一次性关系期间其他性接触的直接问题,以及(b)最近两段关系的开始和结束日期的重叠情况。

结果

尽管通过直接提问报告同时交往的比例为56%,通过日期重叠报告的比例为54%,但两种测量方法之间一致性的kappa统计量仅为一般(0.395)。实际上,通过直接问题报告有同时交往伴侣的人中,有29%通过日期重叠报告时并非如此,而通过日期重叠报告为同时交往的参与者中,有26%通过直接问题报告时并非同时交往。每种测量方法都有不同的相关因素,并且与直接问题测量(1.8%)相比,日期重叠测量方法中同时交往数据缺失或无法解释的情况更常见(21.3%)。

结论

两种测量方法都显示同时交往情况很常见,但这两种测量方法不可互换。尽管日期重叠测量方法提供了关于伴侣关系持续时间的信息,但它容易出现数据缺失或无法解释的情况。直接问题极大地减少了缺失数据的数量,可能更适合用于计算机辅助的调查访谈。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验