关于涂尔干的《自杀论》的另外两点评论。

Two further comments on Durkheim's Le Suicide.

作者信息

Andriessen Karl

机构信息

Suicide Prevention Project, Flemish Mental Health Centres FDGG-VVI, Gent, Belgium.

出版信息

Crisis. 2007;28(1):44-5. doi: 10.1027/0227-5910.28.1.44.

DOI:10.1027/0227-5910.28.1.44

PMID:17555032

Abstract

It appears that the publications of Goldney and Schioldann (2000, 2001a,b, 2002) touched a chord, namely, the quality of the basic literature of contemporary suicidology and the usage of certain words and concepts. This paper adds two comments to this discussion. The first comment focuses on the usage of "altruistic," "egoistic," and "anomic" suicide. The second is a comment on the reception of Le Suicide.

摘要

戈尔迪尼和席奥尔丹（2000年、2001年a、b、2002年）的出版物似乎引起了共鸣，即当代自杀学基础文献的质量以及某些词汇和概念的使用。本文对此讨论补充两点看法。第一点看法聚焦于“利他性”“利己性”和“失范性”自杀的用法。第二点是对《自杀论》接受情况的评论。