Fernquist Robert M
Department of Sociology & Social Work, Central Missouri State University, Warrensburg, Missouri 64093, USA.
Arch Suicide Res. 2007;11(4):361-74. doi: 10.1080/13811110600897226.
Sociological research on Durkheim's theories of egoistic and anomic suicide has given Durkheim continued support more than a century after Durkheim published his work. Recent criticism by Breault (1994), though, argues that Durkheim's theories of suicide actually have not been empirically supported given the lack of psychological variables included in sociological research on suicide rates. Using proxy measures of depression and alcoholism, two known psychological variables to impact suicide, as well as classic Durkheimian variables, suicide rates in eight European countries from 1973-1997 were examined. Results indicate that Durkheim's theories of egoism and anomie, while not completely supported in statistical analysis of suicide rates, received moderate support. Results suggest the continued usefulness of Durkheim's work in aggregate analyses of suicide.
在涂尔干发表其关于自杀的著作一个多世纪后,有关其利己主义自杀理论和失范性自杀理论的社会学研究仍持续给予他支持。不过,布雷奥尔特(1994年)近期提出批评,认为鉴于自杀率的社会学研究中缺乏心理变量,涂尔干的自杀理论实际上并未得到实证支持。研究采用抑郁和酗酒这两个已知会影响自杀的心理变量的替代指标,以及经典的涂尔干学派变量,对1973年至1997年八个欧洲国家的自杀率进行了考察。结果表明,涂尔干的利己主义和失范理论虽在自杀率的统计分析中未得到完全支持,但获得了一定程度的支持。结果显示,涂尔干的著作在自杀的总体分析中仍具有持续的实用性。