Magura Stephen
National Development and Research Institutes, Inc., New York, New York, USA.
Subst Use Misuse. 2007;42(2-3):495-501. doi: 10.1080/10826080601144580.
The "War on Drugs" in the U.S. is consistent with the predominance of the abstinence model for treatment and helps legitimate compulsory treatment. Alternative public health approaches such as harm reduction are suspect and devalued. The mission of treatment risks becoming trivialized, primarily focusing on separating individuals from "illicit" psychoactive substances, in perfect accord with current drug policy. The current policy breeds disrespect for law and imposes enormous social and economic costs on society, without demonstrable effects on the availability or costs of "illicit" drugs. Maintaining the policy has become an end in itself, as shown in the disproportionate campaign against marijuana use, but there are signs that the policy is becoming vulnerable. Similarities to the situation at the time of the repeal of alcohol prohibition in 1933 are discussed.
美国的“毒品战争”与禁欲治疗模式的主导地位相一致,并有助于使强制治疗合法化。诸如减少伤害等替代性公共卫生方法受到怀疑和贬低。治疗的使命有被轻视的风险,主要集中于将个人与“非法”精神活性物质隔离开来,这与当前的毒品政策完全一致。当前的政策滋生了对法律的不尊重,并给社会带来了巨大的社会和经济成本,而对“非法”毒品的可得性或成本却没有明显影响。维持该政策本身已成为目的,如针对大麻使用的不成比例的打击行动所示,但有迹象表明该政策正变得不堪一击。文中还讨论了与1933年禁酒令废除时情况的相似之处。