• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

诺氟沙星和甲氧苄啶-磺胺甲恶唑疗法在预防自发性细菌性腹膜炎方面具有相似的疗效。

Norfloxacin and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole therapy have similar efficacy in prevention of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis.

作者信息

Lontos Steve, Gow Paul J, Vaughan Rhys B, Angus Peter W

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Austin Health, Melbourne, Australia.

出版信息

J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2008 Feb;23(2):252-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2007.04926.x. Epub 2007 Jun 7.

DOI:10.1111/j.1440-1746.2007.04926.x
PMID:17559367
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Although norfloxacin (N) is widely accepted as the drug of choice for spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP) prophylaxis, there is data to suggest that trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TS) may be similarly effective. However, no studies have compared the efficacy and safety of N and TS in SBP prophylaxis. The aim of this retrospective analysis was to compare outcomes in patients who received either N or TS for the prevention of SBP.

METHODS

Records of all cirrhotic patients prescribed either N or TS for SBP prevention between April 2001 and May 2004 were reviewed. Data collected included age, sex, Child-Pugh score, ascitic protein concentration, etiology of liver disease, infections (SBP, bacteremia, and extraperitoneal infections), side-effects, and survival.

RESULTS

Sixty-nine patients (18 female, 51 male), mean age 53.9 +/- 10.6 years, were prescribed N (n = 37) or TS (n = 32). The Child-Pugh score, model for end-stage liver disease score, and the prevalence of a low ascitic protein (<15 g/L) were similar between the groups (12.0 vs 12.4, 19.7 vs 18.2, and 78% vs 84%, respectively, P > 0.05). Fourteen (38%) infections occurred in the N group and 16 (50%) in the TS group (P > 0.05). Eight patients (21.6%) in the N group and nine (28%) in the TS group developed SBP (P > 0.05). The rates of liver transplantation (10 vs 13), adverse events (two in each group) and death (13 vs 14) were similar in the two treatment groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest N and TS have similar efficacy in preventing SBP. This has significant implications for both the cost of SBP prophylaxis and the prevalence of fluoroquinolone resistance in patients with cirrhosis.

摘要

背景与目的

尽管诺氟沙星(N)被广泛认为是预防自发性细菌性腹膜炎(SBP)的首选药物,但有数据表明甲氧苄啶-磺胺甲恶唑(TS)可能同样有效。然而,尚无研究比较N和TS在预防SBP方面的疗效和安全性。本回顾性分析的目的是比较接受N或TS预防SBP的患者的结局。

方法

回顾了2001年4月至2004年5月期间所有因预防SBP而开具N或TS的肝硬化患者的记录。收集的数据包括年龄、性别、Child-Pugh评分、腹水蛋白浓度、肝病病因、感染(SBP、菌血症和腹膜外感染)、副作用和生存率。

结果

69例患者(18例女性,51例男性),平均年龄53.9±10.6岁,被开具N(n = 37)或TS(n = 32)。两组之间的Child-Pugh评分、终末期肝病模型评分以及低腹水蛋白(<15 g/L)的患病率相似(分别为12.0对12.4、19.7对18.2和78%对84%,P>0.05)。N组发生14例(38%)感染,TS组发生16例(50%)感染(P>0.05)。N组8例患者(21.6%)和TS组9例患者(28%)发生SBP(P>0.05)。两个治疗组的肝移植率(10对13)、不良事件(每组2例)和死亡率(13对14)相似。

结论

我们的研究结果表明N和TS在预防SBP方面具有相似的疗效。这对SBP预防的成本以及肝硬化患者中氟喹诺酮耐药性的患病率都有重要意义。

相似文献

1
Norfloxacin and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole therapy have similar efficacy in prevention of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis.诺氟沙星和甲氧苄啶-磺胺甲恶唑疗法在预防自发性细菌性腹膜炎方面具有相似的疗效。
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2008 Feb;23(2):252-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2007.04926.x. Epub 2007 Jun 7.
2
Continuous versus inpatient prophylaxis of the first episode of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis with norfloxacin.诺氟沙星连续预防与住院预防自发性细菌性腹膜炎首发发作的比较
Hepatology. 1997 Mar;25(3):532-6. doi: 10.1002/hep.510250306.
3
A randomized controlled study of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole versus norfloxacin for the prevention of infection in cirrhotic patients.一项关于甲氧苄啶-磺胺甲恶唑与诺氟沙星预防肝硬化患者感染的随机对照研究。
J Dig Dis. 2014 May;15(5):260-7. doi: 10.1111/1751-2980.12132.
4
Addition of probiotics to norfloxacin does not improve efficacy in the prevention of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis: a double-blind placebo-controlled randomized-controlled trial.添加益生菌到诺氟沙星并不能提高自发性细菌性腹膜炎的预防效果:一项双盲安慰剂对照随机临床试验。
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012 Jul;24(7):831-9. doi: 10.1097/MEG.0b013e3283537d61.
5
Norfloxacin vs ceftriaxone in the prophylaxis of infections in patients with advanced cirrhosis and hemorrhage.诺氟沙星与头孢曲松预防晚期肝硬化合并出血患者感染的比较
Gastroenterology. 2006 Oct;131(4):1049-56; quiz 1285. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2006.07.010.
6
Parenteral antibiotic prophylaxis of bacterial infections does not improve cost-efficacy of oral norfloxacin in cirrhotic patients with gastrointestinal bleeding.对细菌感染进行肠外抗生素预防并不能提高口服诺氟沙星对肝硬化合并胃肠道出血患者的成本效益。
Am J Gastroenterol. 1998 Dec;93(12):2457-62. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.1998.00704.x.
7
Infections caused by Escherichia coli resistant to norfloxacin in hospitalized cirrhotic patients.住院肝硬化患者中由耐诺氟沙星的大肠杆菌引起的感染。
Hepatology. 1999 Apr;29(4):1064-9. doi: 10.1002/hep.510290406.
8
Clinical significance of spontaneous Aeromonas bacterial peritonitis in cirrhotic patients: a matched case-control study.肝硬化患者自发性气单胞菌细菌性腹膜炎的临床意义:一项配对病例对照研究。
Clin Infect Dis. 2008 Jul 1;47(1):66-72. doi: 10.1086/588665.
9
Clinical significance and outcome of nosocomial acquisition of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis in patients with liver cirrhosis.肝硬化患者医院获得性自发性细菌性腹膜炎的临床意义及预后
Clin Infect Dis. 2009 May 1;48(9):1230-6. doi: 10.1086/597585.
10
Randomized-controlled trial of rifaximin versus norfloxacin for secondary prophylaxis of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis.利福昔明与诺氟沙星用于自发性细菌性腹膜炎二级预防的随机对照试验。
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016 Dec;28(12):1450-1454. doi: 10.1097/MEG.0000000000000724.

引用本文的文献

1
Fluoroquinolones for the Prophylaxis of Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis in Patients with Liver Cirrhosis: Are They Losing Ground?氟喹诺酮类药物用于肝硬化患者自发性细菌性腹膜炎的预防:它们正在失宠吗?
Life (Basel). 2025 Apr 2;15(4):586. doi: 10.3390/life15040586.
2
ASEPTIC: primary antibiotic prophylaxis using co-trimoxazole to prevent SpontanEous bacterial PeritoniTIs in Cirrhosis-study protocol for an interventional randomised controlled trial.无菌性:使用复方新诺明进行原发性抗生素预防,以预防肝硬化自发性细菌性腹膜炎-一项干预性随机对照试验方案。
Trials. 2022 Sep 27;23(1):812. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06727-6.
3
Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis: a review of treatment options.
自发性细菌性腹膜炎:治疗选择综述
P T. 2009 Apr;34(4):204-10.
4
Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis: How to deal with this life-threatening cirrhosis complication?自发性细菌性腹膜炎:如何应对这种危及生命的肝硬化并发症?
Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2008 Oct;4(5):919-25. doi: 10.2147/tcrm.s2688.