Suppr超能文献

法洛四联症与心室分隔术用于双入口左心室修复术后晚期心肺反应的比较。

Comparison of late post-operative cardiopulmonary responses in the Fontan versus ventricular septation for double-inlet left ventricular repair.

作者信息

Ohuchi Hideo, Watanabe Kenichi, Kishiki Kanako, Nii Masaki, Wakisaka Yuko, Yagihara Toshikatsu, Echigo Shigeyuki

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, National Cardiovascular Center, Osaka, Japan.

出版信息

Am J Cardiol. 2007 Jun 15;99(12):1757-61. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2007.01.063. Epub 2007 Apr 26.

Abstract

Ventricular septation (VS) and the Fontan procedure are alternatives for definitive repair in patients with double-inlet left ventricle; although VS is theoretically preferable, the current preference in practice is the Fontan procedure. However, the long-term outcomes of both procedures remain unclear. To address this issue, cardiopulmonary responses during exercise were measured in patients with double-inlet left ventricle, and the impact of the type of procedure performed, Fontan or VS, on long-term exercise capacity and late postoperative clinical profiles was assessed. Fourteen post-Fontan patients (mean age 17+/-6 years) and 13 VS patients (mean age 19+/-4 years) underwent exercise testing. Of the 13 VS patients, 5 required atrioventricular valve replacement (AVVR), and 7 required pacemaker implantation. Although no difference in peak oxygen uptake was found between the VS and Fontan patients, peak oxygen uptake was higher in VS patients without AVVR (30+/-8 ml/kg/min) than in VS patients with AVVR (19+/-1 ml/kg/min) and Fontan patients (22+/-6 ml/kg/min) (p<0.01). There was no significant difference in peak oxygen uptake between the VS patients with and without pacemaker implantation (p=0.09). The clinical profiles of the VS and Fontan patients were similar in terms of medication and freedom from tachyarrhythmias or reoperations during the follow-up period. In conclusion, the data suggest that VS without AVVR provides excellent future exercise capacity in selected patients with double-inlet left ventricle.

摘要

心室分隔术(VS)和Fontan手术是双入口左心室患者确定性修复的替代方案;尽管从理论上讲VS更可取,但目前在实际操作中更倾向于Fontan手术。然而,这两种手术的长期结果仍不明确。为了解决这个问题,我们测量了双入口左心室患者运动期间的心肺反应,并评估了所施行手术类型(Fontan手术或VS)对长期运动能力和术后晚期临床特征的影响。14例接受Fontan手术的患者(平均年龄17±6岁)和13例接受VS手术的患者(平均年龄19±4岁)接受了运动测试。在13例接受VS手术的患者中,5例需要进行房室瓣置换(AVVR),7例需要植入起搏器。虽然VS组和Fontan组患者的峰值摄氧量没有差异,但未进行AVVR的VS组患者的峰值摄氧量(30±8 ml/kg/min)高于接受AVVR的VS组患者(19±1 ml/kg/min)和Fontan组患者(22±6 ml/kg/min)(p<0.01)。植入起搏器和未植入起搏器的VS组患者之间的峰值摄氧量没有显著差异(p=0.09)。在随访期间,VS组和Fontan组患者在用药以及无快速心律失常或再次手术方面的临床特征相似。总之,数据表明,对于选定的双入口左心室患者,未进行AVVR的VS手术能提供出色的未来运动能力。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验