• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

胃残端癌与原发性近端胃癌的治疗及预后比较

Treatment and prognosis of gastric stump carcinoma in comparison with primary proximal gastric cancer.

作者信息

Schaefer Nico, Sinning Christoph, Standop Jens, Overhaus Marcus, Hirner Andreas, Wolff Martin

机构信息

Department of Surgery, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.

出版信息

Am J Surg. 2007 Jul;194(1):63-7. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2006.12.037.

DOI:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2006.12.037
PMID:17560911
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The intention of this study was to evaluate the outcome of patients with gastric stump cancer (GSC) in comparison with patients treated for primary proximal gastric cancer (PPGC).

METHODS

Nineteen patients with GSC undergoing surgery between January 1989 and August 2005 were compared with 194 PPGC patients treated during the same time period. Various factors such as epidemiologic data, type of treatment, and histopathologic data were evaluated in the analysis.

RESULTS

The overall 5-year disease-specific survival was 42% for resected GSC patients in comparison with 37% for resected PPGC patients. There was no statistically significant difference in the survival rate detected between these 2 groups. On multivariate analysis the infiltration of the gastrojejunal anastomosis by the carcinoma was shown to be a significant predictor for the outcome of patients with GSC.

CONCLUSIONS

In summary, no significant difference in the outcome between GSC and PPGC has been detected.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在评估胃残端癌(GSC)患者与原发性近端胃癌(PPGC)患者的治疗结果。

方法

将1989年1月至2005年8月期间接受手术的19例GSC患者与同期治疗的194例PPGC患者进行比较。分析中评估了各种因素,如流行病学数据、治疗类型和组织病理学数据。

结果

切除的GSC患者的5年疾病特异性生存率为42%,而切除的PPGC患者为37%。这两组之间的生存率没有统计学上的显著差异。多因素分析显示,癌组织对胃肠吻合口的浸润是GSC患者预后的重要预测因素。

结论

总之,未发现GSC和PPGC患者的治疗结果有显著差异。

相似文献

1
Treatment and prognosis of gastric stump carcinoma in comparison with primary proximal gastric cancer.胃残端癌与原发性近端胃癌的治疗及预后比较
Am J Surg. 2007 Jul;194(1):63-7. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2006.12.037.
2
Gastric stump cancer after stomach resection due to peptic disease.因消化性疾病行胃切除术后发生的残胃癌。
Chir Ital. 1996;48(4):9-12.
3
Progression and prognosis of gastric stump cancer.残胃癌的进展与预后
J Surg Oncol. 2009 Nov 1;100(6):472-6. doi: 10.1002/jso.21370.
4
Treatment and outcome of patients with gastric remnant cancer after resection for peptic ulcer disease.胃大部切除术后治疗消化性溃疡胃残胃癌患者的疗效及预后
Ann Surg Oncol. 2011 Mar;18(3):670-6. doi: 10.1245/s10434-010-1425-1. Epub 2010 Nov 10.
5
Comparative study of the pathological characteristics of gastric stump carcinoma and carcinoma of the upper third of the stomach.胃残端癌与胃上三分之一癌病理特征的比较研究
Isr Med Assoc J. 2011 Sep;13(9):534-6.
6
Gastric remnant carcinoma after partial gastrectomy for benign and malignant gastric lesions.良性和恶性胃部病变行胃部分切除术后的残胃癌
J Am Coll Surg. 1996 Jan;182(1):1-6.
7
[Carcinoma of the gastric stump. Our experience in 28 treated cases].
Minerva Chir. 1997 Jun;52(6):713-6.
8
Metastatic pattern of lymph node and surgery for gastric stump cancer.残胃癌的淋巴结转移模式及手术治疗
J Surg Oncol. 2003 Apr;82(4):241-6. doi: 10.1002/jso.10228.
9
Gastric remnant carcinoma: just another proximal gastric cancer or a unique entity?残胃癌:仅仅是另一种近端胃癌还是一个独特的实体?
Am J Surg. 1997 Apr;173(4):292-7. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9610(96)00403-5.
10
[Surgical treatment and prognosis of gastric stump cancer].[残胃癌的外科治疗与预后]
Ai Zheng. 2009 May;28(5):511-4.

引用本文的文献

1
Epstein-Barr Virus and Clinico-Endoscopic Characteristics of Gastric Remnant Cancers Compared to Proximal Non-Remnant Cancers: A Population-Based Study.与近端非残胃癌相比,胃残癌的爱泼斯坦-巴尔病毒及临床内镜特征:一项基于人群的研究
Cancers (Basel). 2024 May 24;16(11):2000. doi: 10.3390/cancers16112000.
2
Identification of prognostic signatures in remnant gastric cancer through an interpretable risk model based on machine learning: a multicenter cohort study.基于机器学习的可解释风险模型识别残胃癌的预后特征:多中心队列研究。
BMC Cancer. 2024 Apr 30;24(1):547. doi: 10.1186/s12885-024-12303-9.
3
Appraisal of gastric stump carcinoma and current state of affairs.
胃残端癌评估及现状
World J Clin Cases. 2023 May 6;11(13):2864-2873. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v11.i13.2864.
4
[Tubular gastric elongation surgery for high esophageal-gastric anastomosis after resection of esophageal cancer: analysis of 5 cases].食管癌切除术后高位食管胃吻合的管状胃延长术:5例分析
Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao. 2018 Jan 30;38(1):123-124. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-4254.2018.01.20.
5
Prognosis and clinicopathologic features in patients with gastric stump cancer after curative surgery.胃大部切除术后残胃癌患者的预后及临床病理特征。
Curr Oncol. 2020 Jun;27(3):e259-e264. doi: 10.3747/co.27.6017. Epub 2020 Jun 1.
6
Gastric Remnant Cancer: Is it different From Primary Gastric Cancer? Insights Into a Unique Clinical Entity.残胃癌:它与原发性胃癌不同吗?对一种独特临床实体的见解。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2020 Oct;27(11):4079-4081. doi: 10.1245/s10434-020-08690-5. Epub 2020 Jun 10.
7
Surgery for Gastric Remnant Cancer Results in Similar Overall Survival Rates Compared with Primary Gastric Cancer: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.胃残胃癌的手术治疗与原发性胃癌的总体生存率相当:一项倾向评分匹配分析。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2020 Oct;27(11):4196-4203. doi: 10.1245/s10434-020-08669-2. Epub 2020 Jun 2.
8
Cryptic Early Gastric Carcinoma in Gastric Stump: Challenges in Diagnostic Evaluation.残胃隐匿性早期胃癌:诊断评估中的挑战
Case Rep Pathol. 2019 Dec 17;2019:1794370. doi: 10.1155/2019/1794370. eCollection 2019.
9
Conditional survival and recurrence of remnant gastric cancer after surgical resection: A multi-institutional study.手术切除后残胃癌的条件生存和复发:一项多机构研究。
Cancer Sci. 2020 Feb;111(2):502-512. doi: 10.1111/cas.14231. Epub 2019 Dec 26.
10
Outcomes after completion total gastrectomy for gastric remnant cancer: experience from a Canadian tertiary centre.胃残端癌全胃切除术后的结局:来自加拿大一家三级中心的经验
Can J Surg. 2018 Aug;61(4):270-277. doi: 10.1503/cjs.008417.