Khan Arif, Bose Anjana, Alexopoulos George S, Gommoll Carl, Li Dayong, Gandhi Chetan
Northwest Clinical Research Center, Bellevue, WA 98004, USA.
Clin Drug Investig. 2007;27(7):481-92. doi: 10.2165/00044011-200727070-00005.
Escitalopram is the most selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor antidepressant; in contrast, duloxetine inhibits both serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake. Double-blind comparison studies may help guide treatment decisions by revealing the relative benefits of different therapeutic approaches. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of escitalopram versus duloxetine in the acute treatment of patients with moderate to severe major depressive disorder.
A 1-week, single-blind, placebo lead-in period followed by an 8-week, randomised, double-blind, multicentre, parallel-group comparison was conducted from 20 April 2005 to 10 March 2006 in independent psychiatric research facilities with principal investigators who were board certified in psychiatry. A total of 278 outpatients of 382 patients screened with Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (4th edition)-diagnosed major depressive disorder (Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale [MADRS] total score > or =26) were randomised to the two treatment groups. Eight patients received no medication and were excluded from the safety group. Patients were treated with either escitalopram 10-20 mg/day (fixed at 10 mg/day for the first 4 weeks) or duloxetine 60 mg/day. The primary efficacy variable was change from baseline at week 8 in MADRS total score using the last observation carried forward (LOCF) approach. Efficacy, safety and tolerability measures were prospectively defined in the statistical analysis plan prior to study initiation unless otherwise specifically noted as conducted post hoc.
A significantly greater proportion of escitalopram-treated patients completed the 8-week study compared with duloxetine-treated patients (87% vs 69%, respectively; p < 0.01). Mean baseline MADRS total scores were 31.0 for the escitalopram group and 31.6 for the duloxetine group. At week 8, escitalopram treatment resulted in significantly greater improvement compared with duloxetine on the prospectively defined primary efficacy endpoint of mean change from baseline in MADRS total score using the LOCF approach (least-squares mean difference [LSMD] -2.42; 95% CI -4.73, -0.11; p < 0.05). There was no difference between treatment groups in the observed cases (OC) analysis (LSMD -0.32; 95% CI -2.71, 2.07; p = 0.79). Significantly fewer escitalopram-treated patients discontinued because of adverse events compared with duloxetine (2% vs 13%, respectively; p < 0.01).
These findings suggest that escitalopram is better tolerated and at least as effective as the serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor duloxetine in the treatment of major depressive disorder.
艾司西酞普兰是选择性最高的5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂类抗抑郁药;相比之下,度洛西汀则抑制5-羟色胺和去甲肾上腺素的再摄取。双盲对照研究通过揭示不同治疗方法的相对益处,可能有助于指导治疗决策。本研究评估了艾司西酞普兰与度洛西汀在中重度重度抑郁症患者急性治疗中的疗效和安全性。
2005年4月20日至2006年3月10日,在独立的精神科研究机构进行了为期1周的单盲安慰剂导入期,随后是为期8周的随机、双盲、多中心、平行组对照研究,主要研究者均为获得精神科委员会认证的人员。在382例经《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》(第4版)诊断为重度抑郁症(蒙哥马利-阿斯伯格抑郁量表[MADRS]总分≥26)的筛查患者中,共有278例门诊患者被随机分为两个治疗组。8例患者未接受药物治疗,被排除在安全组之外。患者分别接受艾司西酞普兰10 - 20mg/天(前4周固定为10mg/天)或度洛西汀60mg/天治疗。主要疗效变量是采用末次观察结转(LOCF)法计算第8周时MADRS总分相对于基线的变化。除非另有特别说明为事后进行,否则疗效、安全性和耐受性指标在研究开始前的统计分析计划中进行前瞻性定义。
与度洛西汀治疗的患者相比,接受艾司西酞普兰治疗的患者完成8周研究的比例显著更高(分别为87%和69%;p<0.01)。艾司西酞普兰组的平均基线MADRS总分是31.0,度洛西汀组是31.6。在第8周时,采用LOCF法,在预先定义的主要疗效终点即MADRS总分相对于基线的平均变化方面,艾司西酞普兰治疗比度洛西汀有显著更大的改善(最小二乘均值差[LSMD] -2.42;95%可信区间 -4.73,-0.11;p<0.05)。在观察病例(OC)分析中,治疗组之间没有差异(LSMD -0.32;95%可信区间 -2.71,2.07;p = 0.79)。与度洛西汀相比,因不良事件而停药的接受艾司西酞普兰治疗的患者明显更少(分别为2%和13%;p<0.01)。
这些发现表明,在治疗重度抑郁症方面,艾司西酞普兰耐受性更好,且至少与5-羟色胺-去甲肾上腺素再摄取抑制剂度洛西汀疗效相当。