Suppr超能文献

艾司西酞普兰与度洛西汀治疗重度抑郁症急性期的疗效比较:荟萃分析与系统评价

Escitalopram vs duloxetine in acute treatment of major depressive disorder: meta-analysis and systematic review.

作者信息

Maneeton Benchalak, Maneeton Narong, Likhitsathian Surinporn, Woottiluk Pakapan, Wiriyacosol Punjaree, Boonyanaruthee Vudhichai, Srisurapanont Manit

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand,

Psychiatric Nursing Division, Faculty of Nursing, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.

出版信息

Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2018 Aug 2;14:1953-1961. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S152410. eCollection 2018.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Previous evidence indicated that efficacy of escitalopram (Esc) and duloxetine (Dul) was comparable in the treatment of major depressive disorder (MDD). Since such studies had small sample sizes, this study purposefully applied a systematic review to determine the efficacy, acceptability, and tolerability those antidepressants in treatment of MDD.

PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS

The following primary databases were searched in July 2017: Scopus, PubMed, CINAHL, and Cochrane Controlled Trials Register. Any randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of Esc comparison with Dul in the treatment of MDD were included in this review. The primary efficacy of outcome was the pooled mean-changed scores of the rating scales for the standardized rating scales for depression.

RESULTS

A total of 1,120 randomized subjects from 3 RCTs were collected for synthesis in the present meta-analysis. The mean-changed scores of the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD) and Clinical Global Impression - Severity, overall response rate by the HAMD, and remission rate by the HAMD and Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) in the Esc- and Dul-treated groups showed no significant differences. However, the mean-changed score of the MARDS, mean-end scores of Clinical Global Impression - Improvement, and overall response by the MADRS in the Esc-treated group were greater than that of the Dul-treated group. Although the overall discontinuation rate had no significant differences between the 2 groups, the discontinuation rate due to adverse events in the Esc-treated group was greater than that of the Dul-treated group.

LIMITATIONS

This review had limited eligible studies.

CONCLUSION

This review indicated the efficacy in the acute treatment of Esc vs Dul varied relying on measurements across the studies. However, the tolerability of Esc was superior to Dul in acute MDD treatment. Therefore, selection between the 2 antidepressants may depend on the tolerability of MDD patients. Due to limited included studies in this review, more large-scale and well-defined RCTs in such patients should be carried out to determine these outcomes.

摘要

背景

先前的证据表明,艾司西酞普兰(Esc)和度洛西汀(Dul)在治疗重度抑郁症(MDD)方面疗效相当。由于此类研究样本量较小,本研究有针对性地进行了一项系统评价,以确定这些抗抑郁药治疗MDD的疗效、可接受性和耐受性。

参与者与方法

2017年7月检索了以下主要数据库:Scopus、PubMed、CINAHL和Cochrane对照试验注册库。本评价纳入了任何比较Esc与Dul治疗MDD的随机对照试验(RCT)。主要结局疗效是抑郁标准化评定量表评分量表的合并平均变化分数。

结果

本荟萃分析共纳入3项RCT的1120名随机受试者进行综合分析。Esc治疗组和Dul治疗组的汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HAMD)平均变化分数、临床总体印象-严重程度、HAMD总体缓解率以及HAMD和蒙哥马利-艾森伯格抑郁量表(MADRS)缓解率均无显著差异。然而,Esc治疗组的MADRS平均变化分数、临床总体印象-改善平均终末分数以及MADRS总体缓解率均高于Dul治疗组。虽然两组的总体停药率无显著差异,但Esc治疗组因不良事件导致的停药率高于Dul治疗组。

局限性

本评价纳入的合格研究有限。

结论

本评价表明,Esc与Dul在急性治疗中的疗效因研究中的测量方法而异。然而,在急性MDD治疗中,Esc的耐受性优于Dul。因此,这两种抗抑郁药的选择可能取决于MDD患者的耐受性。由于本评价纳入的研究有限,应开展更多针对此类患者的大规模、明确的RCT来确定这些结果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/41df/6080875/4e8f8d3702bf/ndt-14-1953Fig1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验