Bradley Rebekah, Hilsenroth Mark, Guarnaccia Clifford, Westen Drew
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA.
Psychol Assess. 2007 Jun;19(2):225-9. doi: 10.1037/1040-3590.19.2.225.
The relation between self- and peer-informant reports of personality using psychometric instruments has been the focus of considerable research. The quantified judgments of clinically experienced observers such as treating clinicians have also been studied. The focus of the present article is on the measurement of 3 personality disorders (borderline, antisocial, and obsessive-compulsive) using the Shedler-Westen Assessment Procedure (SWAP-200), an instrument designed to quantify personality ratings made by clinically experienced informants, and the self-report Personality Assessment Inventory (PAI). SWAP-200 personality disorder scales showed small to medium correlations with borderline and antisocial personality disorder scales from the PAI. As predicted, SWAP-200 obsessive-compulsive personality disorder correlated negatively with these scales, suggesting discriminant validity.
使用心理测量工具时,自我报告与同伴报告的人格之间的关系一直是大量研究的焦点。临床经验丰富的观察者(如主治医生)的量化判断也已得到研究。本文的重点是使用施德勒-韦斯顿评估程序(SWAP-200)来测量三种人格障碍(边缘型、反社会型和强迫型),该工具旨在量化临床经验丰富的信息提供者做出的人格评分,以及自我报告的人格评估问卷(PAI)。SWAP-200人格障碍量表与PAI中的边缘型和反社会型人格障碍量表显示出小到中等程度的相关性。正如预测的那样,SWAP-200强迫型人格障碍与这些量表呈负相关,表明具有区分效度。