Carroll Aaron E, Marrero David G, Swenson Melinda M
Children's Health Services Research, Indiana University, School of Medicine, The Regenstrief Institute for Health Care, Indianapolis 46202, USA.
Res Theory Nurs Pract. 2007;21(2):135-42. doi: 10.1891/088971807780852048.
Almost all patient-centered research is dependent on voluntary participation by participants. Many forces, however, act to either encourage or inhibit people from deciding to participate. This study explored adolescents' with type 1 diabetes and their parents' reasons for participating in a research study. We recruited adolescents with type 1 diabetes mellitus and their parents to participate in a focus group study. Qualitative analysis of the focus group data followed a set procedure: (a) audio review, (b) reading through transcriptions, (c) discussions among investigators regarding key elements of participants' perceptions, (d) determination of conceptual themes, and (e) assignment of relevant responses to appropriate thematic constructs. The 10 focus groups involved 59 participants. The three major themes that developed were giving and receiving, desire for peer socialization, and need for validation. Themes captured the reasons adolescents with type 1 diabetes and their parents decided to participate in this research. A better understanding of why people participate in research may help us to meet their needs and desires more completely. Designing research to meet these reasons will have the dual affect of increasing participation while also better serving those who choose to be studied.
几乎所有以患者为中心的研究都依赖于参与者的自愿参与。然而,有许多因素会促使或阻碍人们决定参与。本研究探讨了1型糖尿病青少年及其父母参与一项研究的原因。我们招募了1型糖尿病青少年及其父母参与一项焦点小组研究。对焦点小组数据的定性分析遵循一套既定程序:(a) 音频审查,(b) 通读转录文本,(c) 研究人员就参与者认知的关键要素进行讨论,(d) 确定概念主题,以及 (e) 将相关回答分配到适当的主题框架中。10个焦点小组共有59名参与者。形成的三个主要主题是给予与接受、对同伴社交的渴望以及对认可的需求。这些主题反映了1型糖尿病青少年及其父母决定参与本研究的原因。更好地理解人们参与研究的原因可能有助于我们更全面地满足他们的需求和愿望。设计符合这些原因的研究将产生双重效果,既增加参与度,又能更好地服务于那些选择参与研究的人。