Suppr超能文献

青少年对采用引导式自我决定-青年法参与团体教育的认知:一项定性研究。

Adolescents' perceptions of participation in group education using the Guided Self-Determination-Young method: a qualitative study.

作者信息

Brorsson Anna Lena, Lindholm Olinder Anna, Viklund Gunnel, Granström Therese, Leksell Janeth

机构信息

Department of Women's and Children's Health, Karolinska Institutet and Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.

School of Education, Health and Social Studies, Högskolan Dalarna, Falun, Sweden.

出版信息

BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2017 Nov 26;5(1):e000432. doi: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2017-000432. eCollection 2017.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Guided Self-Determination (GSD) is a person-centered communication and reflection method. Education in groups may have a greater impact than the content of the education, and constructive communication between parents and adolescents has been shown to be of importance. The purpose of this study was to describe adolescents' perceptions of participation in group education with the Guided Self-Determination-Young (GSD-Y) method, together with parents, in connection with the introduction of continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

In the present qualitative interview study, 13 adolescents with type 1 diabetes were included after completing a GSD-Y group education program in connection with the introduction of continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion at three hospitals located in central Sweden. The adolescents were interviewed individually, and qualitative content analysis was applied to the interview transcripts.

RESULTS

Two categories that emerged from the analysis were the importance of context and growing in power through the group process. An overarching theme that emerged from the interviews was the importance of expert and referent power in growing awareness of the importance of self-management as well as mitigating the loneliness of diabetes.

CONCLUSIONS

GSD-Y has, in various ways, mitigated experiences of loneliness and contributed to conscious reflection about self-management in the group (referent power) together with the group leader (expert power). Overall, this highlights the benefits of group education, and the GSD method emphasizes the person-centered approach.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ISRCTN22444034; Results.

摘要

目的

引导式自主决定(GSD)是一种以个人为中心的沟通与反思方法。小组教育可能比教育内容产生更大的影响,并且已证明父母与青少年之间的建设性沟通很重要。本研究的目的是描述青少年对与父母一起采用青少年引导式自主决定(GSD-Y)方法参与小组教育的看法,该教育与持续皮下胰岛素输注的引入相关。

研究设计与方法

在本定性访谈研究中,瑞典中部三家医院在引入持续皮下胰岛素输注时,13名1型糖尿病青少年在完成GSD-Y小组教育项目后被纳入研究。对青少年进行单独访谈,并对访谈记录应用定性内容分析。

结果

分析得出的两类结果是背景的重要性以及通过小组过程增强力量。访谈中出现的一个总体主题是专家权力和参照权力在提高自我管理重要性的认识以及减轻糖尿病孤独感方面的重要性。

结论

GSD-Y以多种方式减轻了孤独感,并有助于在小组中(参照权力)以及与小组领导者(专家权力)一起对自我管理进行有意识的反思。总体而言,这突出了小组教育的益处,并且GSD方法强调以个人为中心的方法。

试验注册号

ISRCTN22444034;结果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c9b/5717419/977676f24034/bmjdrc-2017-000432f01.jpg

相似文献

1
Adolescents' perceptions of participation in group education using the Guided Self-Determination-Young method: a qualitative study.
BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2017 Nov 26;5(1):e000432. doi: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2017-000432. eCollection 2017.
3
Written reflection in an eHealth intervention for adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a qualitative study.
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2018 Feb 28;12:311-320. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S154612. eCollection 2018.
6
Dropout From an eHealth Intervention for Adults With Type 2 Diabetes: A Qualitative Study.
J Med Internet Res. 2017 May 30;19(5):e187. doi: 10.2196/jmir.7479.
7
Living with sensor-augmented pump therapy in type 1 diabetes: adolescents' and parents' search for harmony.
Can J Diabetes. 2014 Aug;38(4):256-62. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjd.2014.02.002. Epub 2014 Jul 9.
8
The patient's agenda: nurses' experience of learning and using guided self-determination.
Scand J Caring Sci. 2022 Mar;36(1):120-130. doi: 10.1111/scs.12969. Epub 2021 Feb 11.
10
Adolescents' perceptions of the transition process from parental management to self-management of type 1 diabetes.
Scand J Caring Sci. 2019 Mar;33(1):128-135. doi: 10.1111/scs.12611. Epub 2018 Aug 28.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

3
Implementing a structured education program for children with diabetes: lessons learnt from an integrated process evaluation.
BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2015 Apr 28;3(1):e000065. doi: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2014-000065. eCollection 2015.
5
ISPAD Clinical Practice Consensus Guidelines 2014. Diabetes education in children and adolescents.
Pediatr Diabetes. 2014 Sep;15 Suppl 20:77-85. doi: 10.1111/pedi.12187.
6
ISPAD Clinical Practice Consensus Guidelines 2014. Diabetes in adolescence.
Pediatr Diabetes. 2014 Sep;15 Suppl 20:245-56. doi: 10.1111/pedi.12169. Epub 2014 Jul 12.
8
Using qualitative methods to evaluate a family behavioral intervention for type 1 diabetes.
J Pediatr Health Care. 2014 Sep-Oct;28(5):376-85. doi: 10.1016/j.pedhc.2013.09.002. Epub 2013 Oct 24.
9
The Family Education Diabetes Series: improving health in an urban-dwelling American Indian community.
Qual Health Res. 2012 Nov;22(11):1524-34. doi: 10.1177/1049732312457469. Epub 2012 Aug 21.
10
A qualitative study of young people's perspectives of living with type 1 diabetes: do perceptions vary by levels of metabolic control?
J Adv Nurs. 2013 Jun;69(6):1235-47. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2012.06111.x. Epub 2012 Aug 5.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验