May Peter, Trethewy Christopher
Department of Emergency Medicine and Critical Care, Tamworth Base Hospital, Tamworth, New South Wales, Australia.
Emerg Med Australas. 2007 Jun;19(3):207-12. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-6723.2007.00921.x.
To assess task training in cricoid pressure application suitable for incorporation into the algorithm for rapid sequence induction in acute care.
A blinded prospective direct observational study of 110 critical care staff of two hospitals in regional New South Wales. Each participant was instructed to apply blinded cricoid force within the target range of 30-40 N to a cricoid model mounted on a weighing scale and the result recorded. After up to 3 min of unblinded practice without coaching on the same model a repeat blinded application of force was recorded. The pre- and post-intervention results were compared.
At the pre-intervention stage, 22 participants (20%) applied initial pressure within the target range, increasing to 57 (52%) at the post-intervention stage (chi(2) = 24.19, d.f. = 1, P < 0.01; odds ratio [OR] = 0.23; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.12-0.44). The post-intervention results show a significant improvement in the number of participants achieving the target range in both nursing (chi(2) = 20.42, d.f. = 1, P < 0.01; OR = 0.18; 95% CI 0.08-0.42) and medical subgroups (chi(2) = 4.68, d.f. = 1, P = 0.03; OR = 0.34; 95% CI 0.11-1.02). The number applying force sufficient to prevent regurgitation, that is 30 N or greater, rose from 71 to 97 (65% to 88%) (chi(2) = 17.02, d.f. = 1, P < 0.01; OR = 0.24; 95% CI 0.11-0.51). The number applying in excess of 44 N fell from 41 to 25 (37% to 21%) (chi(2) = 5.54, d.f. = 1, P < 0.02; OR = 2.02; 95% CI 1.08-3.81).
The application of cricoid force by critical care staff can be significantly improved by up to 3 min of practice on a simple task trainer.
评估环状软骨按压任务训练,以确定其是否适合纳入急性护理快速顺序诱导算法。
对新南威尔士州地区两家医院的110名重症护理人员进行一项前瞻性双盲直接观察研究。指导每位参与者对安装在秤上的环状软骨模型施加30至40牛的双盲环状软骨压力,并记录结果。在对同一模型进行长达3分钟的无指导非盲法练习后,再次记录双盲压力施加情况。比较干预前后的结果。
在干预前阶段,22名参与者(20%)初始压力在目标范围内,干预后阶段增至57名(52%)(卡方检验=24.19,自由度=1,P<0.01;优势比[OR]=0.23;95%置信区间[CI]0.12 - 0.44)。干预后结果显示,护理亚组(卡方检验=20.42,自由度=1,P<0.01;OR=0.18;95%CI 0.08 - 0.42)和医疗亚组(卡方检验=4.68,自由度=1,P=0.03;OR=0.34;95%CI 0.11 - 1.02)中达到目标范围的参与者数量均有显著改善。施加足以防止反流的力(即30牛或更大)的人数从71人增至97人(65%至88%)(卡方检验=17.02,自由度=1,P<0.01;OR=0.24;95%CI 0.11 - 0.51)。施加超过44牛压力的人数从41人降至25人(37%至21%)(卡方检验=5.54,自由度=1,P<0.02;OR=2.02;95%CI 1.08 - 3.81)。
通过在简单任务训练器上进行长达3分钟的练习,重症护理人员的环状软骨压力施加情况可得到显著改善。