Suppr超能文献

在急诊科对儿童进行侵入性操作时,家庭成员在场会干扰护理工作的开展吗?

Do family members interfere in the delivery of care when present during invasive paediatric procedures in the emergency department?

作者信息

Ryan Glenn, Treston Greg

机构信息

Redcliffe District Hospital, Redcliffe, Queensland, Australia.

出版信息

Emerg Med Australas. 2007 Jun;19(3):234-40. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-6723.2007.00962.x.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether family members interfere with patient care when present during invasive procedures performed on their children in the ED.

METHODS

A prospective observational study of consecutive cases of procedural sedation of children aged between 12 months and 16 years was conducted between March 2002 and March 2006 in the ED of a secondary-level regional hospital in south-east Queensland. Procedures performed included laceration repair, fracture reduction, foreign body removal and abscess incision and drainage. Parents/primary caregivers were encouraged to stay with their child. A stepwise explanation of the procedure and sedation to be used was undertaken, informed consent obtained and telephone follow up attempted 5-14 days post procedure.

RESULTS

Six hundred and fifty-two patient encounters with parents or primary caregivers present for the procedure were included for a total of 656 procedures: 234 laceration repairs, 250 fracture reductions, 85 foreign body removals, 33 abscess incision and drainages, 14 dislocation reductions and 40 other procedures. Telephone follow up was successful in 65% (424) of cases. The mean age was 6.5 years. Family member interference occurred in one case (0.15%, 95% confidence interval 0-0.73%). In 17 cases (2.68%, 95% confidence interval 2.1-5.9%) family members present expressed concerns about the procedure during the telephone follow up but had not interfered at the time of the procedure. There were no significant differences between the concerned parents at follow up and the study group across key patient variables such as child's age (P = 0.369), weight (P = 0.379), respiratory rate (P = 0.477), sex (P = 0.308), procedure indication (P = 0.308) and airway manoeuvres (P = 0.153).

CONCLUSION

When family members are encouraged to stay for invasive procedures performed on their child, and careful explanation of the procedure, sedation, possible complications, choice of medication for sedation and possible side-effects is undertaken, family member interference is extremely rare.

摘要

目的

确定在急诊科对儿童进行侵入性操作时,家庭成员在场是否会干扰对患儿的护理。

方法

2002年3月至2006年3月期间,在昆士兰州东南部一家二级地区医院的急诊科,对12个月至16岁儿童连续进行程序性镇静的病例进行了前瞻性观察研究。所进行的操作包括伤口缝合、骨折复位、异物取出以及脓肿切开引流。鼓励父母/主要照顾者陪伴在孩子身边。对即将进行的操作和镇静方法进行了逐步解释,获得了知情同意,并在操作后5 - 14天尝试进行电话随访。

结果

纳入了652例有父母或主要照顾者在场的患儿操作,共计656项操作:234例伤口缝合、250例骨折复位、85例异物取出、33例脓肿切开引流、14例脱位复位以及40例其他操作。65%(424例)的病例电话随访成功。平均年龄为6.5岁。有1例(0.15%,95%置信区间0 - 0.73%)出现家庭成员干扰。在17例(2.68%,95%置信区间2.1 - 5.9%)病例中,在场的家庭成员在电话随访时对操作表示担忧,但在操作时未进行干扰。在随访时表示担忧的父母与研究组在关键患者变量方面无显著差异,如孩子的年龄(P = 0.369)、体重(P = 0.379)、呼吸频率(P = 0.477)、性别(P = 0.308)、操作指征(P = 0.308)和气道操作(P = 0.153)。

结论

当鼓励家庭成员陪伴孩子进行侵入性操作,并对操作、镇静、可能的并发症、镇静药物选择及可能的副作用进行详细解释时,家庭成员的干扰极为罕见。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验