• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对比剂肾病的预防:一项批判性综述。

Prevention of contrast-induced nephropathy: a critical review.

作者信息

Van Praet Jens T, De Vriese An S

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, University of Gent, Gent, Belgium.

出版信息

Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens. 2007 Jul;16(4):336-47. doi: 10.1097/MNH.0b013e3281ca6fe5.

DOI:10.1097/MNH.0b013e3281ca6fe5
PMID:17565276
Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Although contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) is common and portends a significant morbidity and mortality, only few large and well designed trials have assessed the available prophylactic measures and there are no clear evidence-based guidelines that can easily be adopted by the clinician. We critically discuss the evidence for periprocedural hydration, pharmacological agents, periprocedural withdrawal of medication, application of renal replacement therapy and the use of contrast media.

RECENT FINDINGS

Pending confirmation of the superiority of sodium bicarbonate, NaCl 0.9% remains the fluid of choice for periprocedural hydration. A recent trial found a dose-dependent beneficial effect of acetylcysteine on CIN and mortality, adding to the controversy on the prophylactic use of this agent. Publication bias of acetylcysteine trials may have confounded the results of the meta-analyses, since negative results were more likely to be published as an abstract only. Periprocedural haemofiltration protected against CIN in a high-risk population, but the results require confirmation before the technique can be recommended.

SUMMARY

Pending randomized controlled trials with rigorous scientific design, we propose practical mixed evidence-based and opinion-based guidelines for the prevention of CIN, using a stratification of patients into three risk groups, based on their renal function and a risk-prediction model.

摘要

综述目的

尽管对比剂肾病(CIN)很常见,且预示着较高的发病率和死亡率,但仅有少数大型且设计良好的试验评估了现有的预防措施,并且没有明确的循证指南可供临床医生轻松采用。我们对围手术期补液、药物、围手术期停药、肾脏替代治疗的应用以及造影剂的使用证据进行了批判性讨论。

最新发现

在碳酸氢钠的优越性得到证实之前,0.9%氯化钠溶液仍是围手术期补液的首选液体。最近一项试验发现乙酰半胱氨酸对CIN和死亡率有剂量依赖性的有益作用,这增加了该药物预防性使用的争议。乙酰半胱氨酸试验的发表偏倚可能混淆了荟萃分析的结果,因为阴性结果更有可能仅以摘要形式发表。围手术期血液滤过在高危人群中可预防CIN,但在推荐该技术之前,结果需要得到证实。

总结

在进行严格科学设计的随机对照试验之前,我们基于患者的肾功能和风险预测模型,将患者分为三个风险组,提出了实用的基于混合证据和观点的CIN预防指南。

相似文献

1
Prevention of contrast-induced nephropathy: a critical review.对比剂肾病的预防:一项批判性综述。
Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens. 2007 Jul;16(4):336-47. doi: 10.1097/MNH.0b013e3281ca6fe5.
2
Contrast-induced nephropathy: a review.对比剂肾病:综述
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2005 Apr-Jun;6(2):82-8. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2005.07.004.
3
Strategies to prevent contrast nephropathy.预防对比剂肾病的策略。
Minerva Cardioangiol. 2005 Oct;53(5):445-63.
4
Evidence-based emergency medicine review. Prevention of contrast-induced nephropathy in the emergency department.循证急诊医学综述。急诊科对比剂肾病的预防
Ann Emerg Med. 2007 Sep;50(3):335-45, 345.e1-2. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2007.01.023. Epub 2007 May 21.
5
Contrast-induced nephropathy.造影剂肾病
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2008 Jan 1;71(1):62-72. doi: 10.1002/ccd.21207.
6
Forced euvolemic diuresis with mannitol and furosemide for prevention of contrast-induced nephropathy in patients with CKD undergoing coronary angiography: a randomized controlled trial.使用甘露醇和呋塞米进行强制等容利尿以预防接受冠状动脉造影的慢性肾脏病患者发生造影剂肾病:一项随机对照试验。
Am J Kidney Dis. 2009 Oct;54(4):602-9. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2009.03.024. Epub 2009 Jun 17.
7
N-acetylcysteine prophylaxis significantly reduces the risk of radiocontrast-induced nephropathy: comprehensive meta-analysis.N-乙酰半胱氨酸预防可显著降低放射性造影剂诱发肾病的风险:全面荟萃分析。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2005 Apr;64(4):471-9. doi: 10.1002/ccd.20342.
8
Strategies to reduce the risk of contrast nephropathy: an evidence-based approach.降低对比剂肾病风险的策略:一种基于证据的方法。
Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens. 2006 May;15(3):285-90. doi: 10.1097/01.mnh.0000222696.92088.28.
9
[Prophylaxis of contrast-induced nephropathy with N-acetylcysteine].用N-乙酰半胱氨酸预防造影剂肾病
Zentralbl Chir. 2007 Jun;132(3):227-31. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-960756.
10
[Contrast-induced nephropathy. Current concepts and propositions for Italian guidelines].[造影剂肾病。意大利指南的当前概念与建议]
Recenti Prog Med. 2008 Mar;99(3):155-62.

引用本文的文献

1
Prevention of Contrast and Radiation Injury During Coronary Angiography and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.冠状动脉造影和经皮冠状动脉介入治疗期间对比剂和辐射损伤的预防
Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med. 2018 Mar 22;20(4):32. doi: 10.1007/s11936-018-0621-3.
2
Optimal predialysis care.最佳透析前护理。
NDT Plus. 2008 Oct;1(Suppl 4):iv7-iv13. doi: 10.1093/ndtplus/sfn117.
3
Effect of N-acetylcysteine pretreatment of deceased organ donors on renal allograft function: a randomized controlled trial.已故器官捐献者的N-乙酰半胱氨酸预处理对肾移植功能的影响:一项随机对照试验。
Transplantation. 2015 Apr;99(4):746-53. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000000395.
4
Section 4: Contrast-induced AKI.第4节:造影剂诱导的急性肾损伤。
Kidney Int Suppl (2011). 2012 Mar;2(1):69-88. doi: 10.1038/kisup.2011.34.
5
Section 3: Prevention and Treatment of AKI.第3节:急性肾损伤的预防与治疗。
Kidney Int Suppl (2011). 2012 Mar;2(1):37-68. doi: 10.1038/kisup.2011.33.
6
Contrast media viscosity versus osmolality in kidney injury: lessons from animal studies.肾损伤中造影剂粘度与渗透压的关系:来自动物研究的经验教训。
Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:358136. doi: 10.1155/2014/358136. Epub 2014 Feb 23.
7
Contrast induced nephropathy: updated ESUR Contrast Media Safety Committee guidelines.对比剂肾病:更新的 ESUR 对比剂安全委员会指南。
Eur Radiol. 2011 Dec;21(12):2527-41. doi: 10.1007/s00330-011-2225-0. Epub 2011 Aug 25.
8
Sodium bicarbonate plus N-acetylcysteine prophylaxis: a meta-analysis.碳酸氢钠联合乙酰半胱氨酸预防:一项荟萃分析。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2009 Nov;2(11):1116-24. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2009.07.015.
9
[Contrast induced nephropathy].[对比剂肾病]
Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2009;121(1-2):15-32. doi: 10.1007/s00508-009-1145-3.
10
Management of a patient with a mass in an ectopic kidney.异位肾肿物患者的管理
Curr Urol Rep. 2007 Nov;8(6):427-30. doi: 10.1007/s11934-007-0043-3.