Suppr超能文献

体内和体外脑微血管内皮细胞的基因组比较。

A genomic comparison of in vivo and in vitro brain microvascular endothelial cells.

作者信息

Calabria Anthony R, Shusta Eric V

机构信息

Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin 53706, USA.

出版信息

J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2008 Jan;28(1):135-48. doi: 10.1038/sj.jcbfm.9600518. Epub 2007 Jun 13.

Abstract

The blood-brain barrier (BBB) is composed of uniquely differentiated brain microvascular endothelial cells (BMEC). Often, it is of interest to replicate these attributes in the form of an in vitro model, and such models are widely used in the research community. However, the BMEC used to create in vitro BBB models de-differentiate in culture and lose many specialized characteristics. These changes are poorly understood at a molecular level, and little is known regarding the consequences of removing BMEC from their local in vivo microenvironment. To address these issues, suppression subtractive hybridization (SSH) was used to identify 25 gene transcripts that were differentially expressed between in vivo and in vitro BMEC. Genes affected included those involved in angiogenesis, transport and neurogenesis, and real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) verified transcripts were primarily and significantly downregulated. Since this quantitative gene panel represented those BMEC characteristics lost upon culture, we used it to assess how culture manipulation, specifically BMEC purification and barrier induction by hydrocortisone, influenced the quality of in vitro models. Puromycin purification of BMEC elicited minimal differences compared with untreated BMEC, as assessed by qPCR. In contrast, qPCR-based gene panel analysis after induction with hydrocortisone indicated a modest shift of 10 of the 23 genes toward a more 'in vivo-like' gene expression profile, which correlated with improved barrier phenotype. Genomic analysis of BMEC de-differentiation in culture has thus yielded a functionally diverse set of genes useful for comparing the in vitro and in vivo BBB.

摘要

血脑屏障(BBB)由独特分化的脑微血管内皮细胞(BMEC)组成。通常,人们有兴趣以体外模型的形式复制这些特性,并且此类模型在研究领域中被广泛使用。然而,用于创建体外血脑屏障模型的BMEC在培养过程中会去分化并失去许多特殊特性。这些变化在分子水平上了解甚少,并且对于将BMEC从其局部体内微环境中移除的后果知之甚少。为了解决这些问题,采用抑制性消减杂交(SSH)来鉴定在体内和体外BMEC之间差异表达的25个基因转录本。受影响的基因包括那些参与血管生成、转运和神经发生的基因,实时定量聚合酶链反应(qPCR)验证转录本主要且显著下调。由于这个定量基因面板代表了培养后失去的那些BMEC特性,我们用它来评估培养操作,特别是BMEC纯化和氢化可的松诱导屏障形成,如何影响体外模型的质量。通过qPCR评估,与未处理的BMEC相比,嘌呤霉素纯化BMEC引起的差异最小。相反,氢化可的松诱导后的基于qPCR的基因面板分析表明,23个基因中有10个基因适度转向更“类似体内”的基因表达谱,这与改善的屏障表型相关。因此,对培养中BMEC去分化的基因组分析产生了一组功能多样的基因,可用于比较体外和体内的血脑屏障。

相似文献

1
A genomic comparison of in vivo and in vitro brain microvascular endothelial cells.体内和体外脑微血管内皮细胞的基因组比较。
J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2008 Jan;28(1):135-48. doi: 10.1038/sj.jcbfm.9600518. Epub 2007 Jun 13.

引用本文的文献

7
A Historical Review of Brain Drug Delivery.脑药物递送的历史回顾
Pharmaceutics. 2022 Jun 16;14(6):1283. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics14061283.
8
The Effects of Propofol on a Human Blood-Brain Barrier Model.丙泊酚对人血脑屏障模型的影响。
Front Cell Neurosci. 2022 May 11;16:835649. doi: 10.3389/fncel.2022.835649. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
Regulation of glial development by cystatin C.
J Neurochem. 2007 Jan;100(1):12-22. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2006.04169.x. Epub 2006 Oct 25.
4
The rat blood-brain barrier transcriptome.大鼠血脑屏障转录组
J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2006 Jul;26(7):959-73. doi: 10.1038/sj.jcbfm.9600249. Epub 2005 Nov 23.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验