Wood Scott J, Reschke Millard F, Sarmiento Laura A, Clément Gilles
Universities Space Research Association, Houston, TX, USA.
Exp Brain Res. 2007 Sep;182(3):365-77. doi: 10.1007/s00221-007-0994-0. Epub 2007 Jun 13.
The effect of stimulus frequency on tilt and translation motion perception was studied during constant velocity off-vertical axis rotation (OVAR), and compared to the effect of stimulus frequency on eye movements. Fourteen healthy subjects were rotated in darkness about their longitudinal axis 10 degrees and 20 degrees off-vertical at 45 degrees /s (0.125 Hz) and 20 degrees off-vertical at 180 degrees /s (0.5 Hz). Perceived motion was evaluated using verbal reports and a joystick capable of recording tilt and translation in both sagittal and lateral planes. Eye movements were also recorded using videography. At the lower frequency, subjects reported the perception of progressing along the edge of a cone, whereas at the higher frequency they had the sensation of progressing along the edge of an upright cylinder. Tilt perception and ocular torsion significantly increased as the tilt angle increased from 10 degrees to 20 degrees at the lower frequency, and then decreased at the higher frequency. The phase lag of ocular torsion increased as a function of frequency, while the phase lag of tilt perception did not change. Horizontal eye movements were small at the lower frequency and showed a phase lead relative to the linear acceleration stimulus. While the phase lead of horizontal eye movements decreased at 0.5 Hz, the phase of translation perception did not vary with stimulus frequency and was similar to the phase of tilt perception during all conditions. A second data set was obtained in 12 subjects to compare motion perception phase when using a simple push-button to indicate nose-up orientation, continuous setting of pitch tilt alone, or continuous setting of tilt and translation in both pitch and roll planes as in the first data set. This set of measurements indicated that in the frequency range studied subjects tend to lead the stimulus when using a push-button task while lagging the stimulus when using a continuous setting of tilt with a joystick. Both amplitude and phase of tilt perception using the joystick were not different whether concentrating on pitch tilt alone or attempting a more complex reporting of tilt and translation in both sagittal and lateral planes. During dynamic linear stimuli in the absence of canal and visual input, a change in stimulus frequency alone elicits similar changes in the amplitude of both self-motion perception and eye movements. However, in contrast to the eye movements, the phase of both perceived tilt and translation motion is not altered by stimulus frequency over this limited range. These results are consistent with the hypothesis that neural processing to distinguish tilt and translation stimuli differs between eye movements and motion perception.
在等速离垂直轴旋转(OVAR)过程中,研究了刺激频率对倾斜和平移运动感知的影响,并与刺激频率对眼球运动的影响进行了比较。14名健康受试者在黑暗中绕其纵轴分别以45度/秒(0.125赫兹)的速度偏离垂直轴10度和20度,以及以180度/秒(0.5赫兹)的速度偏离垂直轴20度进行旋转。使用言语报告和一个能够记录矢状面和侧面倾斜及平移的操纵杆来评估感知到的运动。还使用摄像记录眼球运动。在较低频率时,受试者报告感觉沿着圆锥边缘前进,而在较高频率时,他们感觉沿着直立圆柱体边缘前进。在较低频率下,随着倾斜角度从10度增加到20度,倾斜感知和眼扭转显著增加,然后在较高频率下下降。眼扭转的相位滞后随频率增加,而倾斜感知的相位滞后没有变化。在较低频率下水平眼球运动较小,并且相对于线性加速度刺激呈现相位超前。虽然在0.5赫兹时水平眼球运动的相位超前减小,但平移感知的相位不随刺激频率变化,并且在所有条件下都与倾斜感知的相位相似。在12名受试者中获得了第二组数据,以比较在使用简单按钮指示鼻尖向上方向、仅连续设置俯仰倾斜或像第一组数据那样在俯仰和横滚平面连续设置倾斜和平移时的运动感知相位。这组测量结果表明,在所研究的频率范围内,受试者在使用按钮任务时倾向于超前刺激,而在使用操纵杆连续设置倾斜时倾向于滞后刺激。无论是仅专注于俯仰倾斜还是尝试更复杂地报告矢状面和侧面的倾斜和平移,使用操纵杆时倾斜感知的幅度和相位都没有差异。在没有半规管和视觉输入的动态线性刺激期间,仅刺激频率的变化会引起自我运动感知和眼球运动幅度的类似变化。然而,与眼球运动相反,在这个有限范围内,感知到的倾斜和平移运动的相位都不会因刺激频率而改变。这些结果与以下假设一致,即区分倾斜和平移刺激的神经处理在眼球运动和运动感知之间存在差异。