Kariyattil Rajeev, Steinbok Paul, Singhal Ashutosh, Cochrane D Douglas
Division of Pediatric Neurosurgery, Department of Pediatric Surgery, British Columbia Children's Hospital, Children's and Women's Health Centre, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
J Neurosurg. 2007 May;106(5 Suppl):350-3. doi: 10.3171/ped.2007.106.5.350.
Ascites and abdominal pseudocysts are two complications that can occur following placement of a ventriculoperitoneal (VP) shunt. Although various factors have been implicated, the exact pathogenesis of the two conditions remains elusive. To the authors' knowledge, there are no studies in which these two obviously related conditions have been compared.
The authors retrospectively reviewed the cases of children with abdominal complications caused by a VP shunt. There were 15 patients who developed a pseudocyst and five patients who developed ascites. The cases were analyzed to identify common and distinguishing factors that may help in identifying the mechanism involved. Abdominal symptoms were the mode of presentation for patients with ascites, whereas shunt malfunction was the mode of presentation in 60% of those with pseudocysts. Culture-proven infection, abdominal surgery, and the number of revisions seemed to be more common in cases with pseudocysts than in ascites. The fluid in ascites was found to be a transudate irrespective of the origin of hydrocephalus. Alternative drainage sites were required in the treatment of patients with ascites, and reimplantation in the peritoneum was possible in 66.7% of those with pseudocysts. In the long-term, however, peritoneal reimplantation was possible in three of the five patients with ascites.
Abdominal pseudocysts and ascites, after VP shunt treatment, are distinct conditions with different modes of presentation and findings during examination of fluid, and therefore they require different management strategies.
腹水和腹部假性囊肿是脑室腹腔(VP)分流术后可能出现的两种并发症。尽管涉及多种因素,但这两种情况的确切发病机制仍不清楚。据作者所知,尚无研究对这两种明显相关的情况进行比较。
作者回顾性分析了因VP分流导致腹部并发症的儿童病例。有15例患者出现假性囊肿,5例患者出现腹水。对这些病例进行分析,以确定可能有助于识别所涉及机制的共同和不同因素。腹部症状是腹水患者的表现方式,而分流故障是60%假性囊肿患者的表现方式。经培养证实的感染、腹部手术和分流管修订次数在假性囊肿病例中似乎比腹水病例更常见。无论脑积水的起源如何,腹水中的液体被发现是漏出液。腹水患者的治疗需要更换引流部位,66.7%的假性囊肿患者可在腹膜内重新植入分流管。然而,从长期来看,5例腹水中有3例可进行腹膜重新植入。
VP分流术后的腹部假性囊肿和腹水是不同的情况,在液体检查时有不同的表现方式和结果,因此需要不同的管理策略。