Valeix Marion, Chamaillé-Jammes Simon, Fritz Hervé
CNRS UPR 1934, Centre d'Etudes Biologiques de Chizé, 79360 Beauvoir-sur-Niort, France.
Oecologia. 2007 Sep;153(3):739-48. doi: 10.1007/s00442-007-0764-5. Epub 2007 Jun 14.
Scarcity of resources may result in high levels of animal aggregation; interference competition can occur in such a scenario and play a role in resource acquisition. Here, we test the hypothesis that animals could minimize interference competition by shifting their temporal niches in relation to competitors. In Hwange National Park, Zimbabwe, we monitored waterholes in order to study agonistic interactions between elephants and other herbivore species. We also used a long-term data set from a yearly survey of waterhole attendance by herbivores to evaluate the influence of the presence of elephants on the use of waterholes by other herbivore species. Our results show that in drier years, waterholes are crowded with elephants early in the afternoon. In general, the species most affected by interference competition with elephants shift their temporal niches at the waterholes, thus maintaining a constant temporal overlaps with elephants. The species less affected by interference competition with elephants show no temporal niche shifts and increase their temporal overlap with elephants at waterholes, as predicted from a noncompetition hypothesis. This study provides evidence that interference competition with a behaviorally dominant large species influences the temporal niches of smaller species, and suggests that the potential costs associated with interference between elephants and other herbivores at waterholes are linked to shifts in diurnal activities rather than interactions and water acquisition itself.
资源稀缺可能导致动物高度聚集;在这种情况下可能会发生干扰竞争,并在资源获取中发挥作用。在这里,我们检验了一个假设,即动物可以通过相对于竞争者改变其时间生态位来最小化干扰竞争。在津巴布韦的万基国家公园,我们监测了水坑,以研究大象与其他食草动物物种之间的争斗互动。我们还使用了来自食草动物每年对水坑到访情况调查的长期数据集,来评估大象的存在对其他食草动物物种使用水坑的影响。我们的结果表明,在较干旱的年份,水坑在下午早些时候就挤满了大象。一般来说,受与大象干扰竞争影响最大的物种会在水坑处改变其时间生态位,从而与大象保持恒定的时间重叠。受与大象干扰竞争影响较小的物种没有表现出时间生态位的变化,并且如非竞争假设所预测的那样,它们在水坑处与大象的时间重叠增加。这项研究提供了证据,表明与行为上占主导地位的大型物种的干扰竞争会影响较小物种的时间生态位,并表明在水坑处大象与其他食草动物之间干扰相关的潜在成本与昼夜活动的变化有关,而不是与互动和水的获取本身有关。