• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腰痛患者恶性肿瘤筛查:一项系统综述

Screening for malignancy in low back pain patients: a systematic review.

作者信息

Henschke Nicholas, Maher Christopher G, Refshauge Kathryn M

机构信息

Back Pain Research Group, School of Physiotherapy, University of Sydney, PO Box 170, Lidcombe, NSW, 1825, Australia.

出版信息

Eur Spine J. 2007 Oct;16(10):1673-9. doi: 10.1007/s00586-007-0412-0. Epub 2007 Jun 14.

DOI:10.1007/s00586-007-0412-0
PMID:17566791
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2078307/
Abstract

To describe the accuracy of clinical features and tests used to screen for malignancy in patients with low back pain. A systematic review was performed on all available records on MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CINAHL electronic databases. Studies were considered eligible if they investigated a cohort of low back pain patients, used an appropriate reference standard, and reported sufficient data on the diagnostic accuracy of tests. Two authors independently assessed methodological quality and extracted data to calculate positive (LR+) and negative (LR-) likelihood ratios. Six studies evaluating 22 different clinical features and tests were identified. The prevalence of malignancy ranged from 0.1 to 3.5%. A previous history of cancer (LR+ = 23.7), elevated ESR (LR+ = 18.0), reduced hematocrit (LR+ = 18.2), and overall clinician judgement (LR+ = 12.1) increased the probability of malignancy when present. A combination of age > or =50 years, a previous history of cancer, unexplained weight loss, and failure to improve after 1 month had a reported sensitivity of 100%. Overall, there was poor reporting of methodological quality items, and very few studies were performed in community primary care settings. Malignancy is rare as a cause of low back pain. The most useful features and tests are a previous history of cancer, elevated ESR, reduced hematocrit, and clinician judgement.

摘要

描述用于筛查腰痛患者恶性肿瘤的临床特征和检查的准确性。对MEDLINE、EMBASE和CINAHL电子数据库中的所有可用记录进行了系统评价。如果研究调查了一组腰痛患者,使用了适当的参考标准,并报告了关于检查诊断准确性的充分数据,则认为这些研究符合条件。两位作者独立评估方法学质量并提取数据以计算阳性(LR+)和阴性(LR-)似然比。确定了六项评估22种不同临床特征和检查的研究。恶性肿瘤的患病率为0.1%至3.5%。有癌症病史(LR+ = 23.7)、血沉升高(LR+ = 18.0)、血细胞比容降低(LR+ = 18.2)以及临床医生的总体判断(LR+ = 12.1)在存在时会增加恶性肿瘤的可能性。年龄≥50岁、有癌症病史、不明原因体重减轻以及1个月后无改善的组合报告的敏感性为100%。总体而言,方法学质量项目的报告较差,并且在社区初级保健环境中进行的研究很少。恶性肿瘤作为腰痛的病因很少见。最有用的特征和检查是有癌症病史、血沉升高、血细胞比容降低以及临床医生的判断。

相似文献

1
Screening for malignancy in low back pain patients: a systematic review.腰痛患者恶性肿瘤筛查:一项系统综述
Eur Spine J. 2007 Oct;16(10):1673-9. doi: 10.1007/s00586-007-0412-0. Epub 2007 Jun 14.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
A systematic review identifies five "red flags" to screen for vertebral fracture in patients with low back pain.一项系统评价确定了五个“红旗”指标,用于筛查腰痛患者的椎体骨折。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2008 Feb;61(2):110-118. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.04.013. Epub 2007 Aug 27.
4
Systematic review of tests to identify the disc, SIJ or facet joint as the source of low back pain.识别椎间盘、骶髂关节或小关节作为腰痛来源的检查的系统评价
Eur Spine J. 2007 Oct;16(10):1539-50. doi: 10.1007/s00586-007-0391-1. Epub 2007 Jun 14.
5
Red flags to screen for vertebral fracture in patients presenting with low-back pain.对出现腰痛的患者进行椎体骨折筛查的警示信号。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Jan 31(1):CD008643. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008643.pub2.
6
The diagnostic value of Red Flags in thoracolumbar pain: a systematic review.红旗征在胸腰段疼痛中的诊断价值:一项系统评价
Disabil Rehabil. 2022 Apr;44(8):1190-1206. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2020.1804626. Epub 2020 Aug 19.
7
Diagnostic test accuracy of nutritional tools used to identify undernutrition in patients with colorectal cancer: a systematic review.用于识别结直肠癌患者营养不良的营养评估工具的诊断测试准确性:一项系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 May 15;13(4):141-87. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1673.
8
Systematic review and validation of prediction rules for identifying children with serious infections in emergency departments and urgent-access primary care.系统评价和验证预测规则,以识别急诊科和紧急初级保健中严重感染的儿童。
Health Technol Assess. 2012;16(15):1-100. doi: 10.3310/hta16150.
9
Diagnostic accuracy of self-report and subjective history in the diagnosis of low back pain with non-specific lower extremity symptoms: A systematic review.自我报告和主观病史对伴有非特异性下肢症状的腰痛诊断的准确性:一项系统评价。
Man Ther. 2015 Feb;20(1):18-27. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2014.08.002. Epub 2014 Aug 29.
10
Spinal fusion for chronic low back pain: systematic review on the accuracy of tests for patient selection.脊柱融合术治疗慢性下腰痛:患者选择测试准确性的系统评价。
Spine J. 2013 Feb;13(2):99-109. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2012.10.001. Epub 2012 Nov 3.

引用本文的文献

1
What guides back pain care? A content analysis of low back pain directives in the Australian context.是什么指导着腰痛治疗?澳大利亚背景下腰痛治疗指南的内容分析。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2023 Jun 13;21(1):49. doi: 10.1186/s12961-023-00997-5.
2
Back pain "red flags": which are most predictive of serious pathology in the Emergency Department?背痛“红旗”:在急诊科中,哪些最能预测严重病变?
Eur Spine J. 2020 Aug;29(8):1870-1878. doi: 10.1007/s00586-020-06452-1. Epub 2020 Jun 3.
3
Prevalence and incidence of low back pain among runners: a systematic review.跑步者腰痛的患病率和发病率:系统评价。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2020 Jun 3;21(1):343. doi: 10.1186/s12891-020-03357-4.
4
Importance of screening in physical therapy: vertebral fracture of thoracolumbar junction in a recreational runner.物理治疗中筛查的重要性:一名业余跑步者的胸腰段椎体骨折
BMJ Case Rep. 2019 Aug 30;12(8):e229987. doi: 10.1136/bcr-2019-229987.
5
The Recent Trend in Diagnosis and Treatment of Chronic Low Back Pain.慢性下腰痛的诊断与治疗新趋势
Spine Surg Relat Res. 2017 Dec 20;1(1):1-6. doi: 10.22603/ssrr.1.2016-0022. eCollection 2017.
6
Development of a clinical decision support tool for diagnostic imaging use in patients with low back pain: a study protocol.开发用于腰痛患者诊断性影像学检查的临床决策支持工具:一项研究方案。
Diagn Progn Res. 2019 Jan 14;3:1. doi: 10.1186/s41512-019-0047-8. eCollection 2019.
7
Gimme that old time religion: the influence of the healthcare belief system of chiropractic's early leaders on the development of x-ray imaging in the profession.给我那古老的信仰:脊椎按摩疗法早期领导者的医疗信仰体系对该行业X光成像发展的影响。
Chiropr Man Therap. 2014 Oct 28;22(1):36. doi: 10.1186/s12998-014-0036-5. eCollection 2014.
8
Clinical examination and physical assessment of hip joint-related pain in athletes.运动员髋关节相关疼痛的临床检查与体格评估
Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2014 Nov;9(6):737-55.
9
Management of LBP at primary care level in South Africa: up to standards?南非基层医疗层面下腰痛的管理:达到标准了吗?
Afr Health Sci. 2014 Sep;14(3):698-706. doi: 10.4314/ahs.v14i3.28.
10
Differential diagnosis of a patient with low back and toe pain.一名伴有腰背痛和足趾疼痛患者的鉴别诊断。
J Man Manip Ther. 2013 May;21(2):81-9. doi: 10.1179/2042618612Y.0000000023.

本文引用的文献

1
Meta-DiSc: a software for meta-analysis of test accuracy data.Meta-DiSc:一款用于检验准确性数据荟萃分析的软件。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2006 Jul 12;6:31. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-6-31.
2
Chapter 3. European guidelines for the management of acute nonspecific low back pain in primary care.第3章. 初级保健中急性非特异性腰痛管理的欧洲指南
Eur Spine J. 2006 Mar;15 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S169-91. doi: 10.1007/s00586-006-1071-2.
3
Systematic review of the diagnosis and management of malignant extradural spinal cord compression: the Cancer Care Ontario Practice Guidelines Initiative's Neuro-Oncology Disease Site Group.恶性硬膜外脊髓压迫症诊断与管理的系统评价:安大略癌症护理实践指南倡议组织神经肿瘤疾病部位组
J Clin Oncol. 2005 Mar 20;23(9):2028-37. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.00.067.
4
The development of QUADAS: a tool for the quality assessment of studies of diagnostic accuracy included in systematic reviews.QUADAS的开发:一种用于系统评价中诊断准确性研究质量评估的工具。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2003 Nov 10;3:25. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-3-25.
5
The diagnostic contribution of the frontal lumbar spine radiograph in community referred low back pain--a prospective study of 1030 patients.
Clin Radiol. 2003 Aug;58(8):606-9. doi: 10.1016/s0009-9260(03)00173-9.
6
The STARD statement for reporting studies of diagnostic accuracy: explanation and elaboration.用于报告诊断准确性研究的STARD声明:解释与详述
Ann Intern Med. 2003 Jan 7;138(1):W1-12. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-138-1-200301070-00012-w1.
7
Conducting systematic reviews of diagnostic studies: didactic guidelines.开展诊断性研究的系统评价:教学指南
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2002 Jul 3;2:9. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-2-9.
8
Systematic reviews of diagnostic research. Considerations about assessment and incorporation of methodological quality.
Eur J Epidemiol. 2001;17(4):301-6. doi: 10.1023/a:1012751326462.
9
Clinical guidelines for the management of low back pain in primary care: an international comparison.初级保健中腰痛管理的临床指南:一项国际比较。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2001 Nov 15;26(22):2504-13; discussion 2513-4. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200111150-00022.
10
Finding cancer in primary care outpatients with low back pain: a comparison of diagnostic strategies.在初级保健门诊的腰痛患者中发现癌症:诊断策略比较
J Gen Intern Med. 2001 Jan;16(1):14-23. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2001.00249.x.