Hucl Tomas, Gallmeier Eike, Kern Scott E
The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Cell Cycle. 2007 Jun 1;6(11):1336-41. doi: 10.4161/cc.6.11.4359. Epub 2007 Jun 27.
Single therapeutic agents very often fail in unselected patients. It is therefore commonplace to combine an agent specifically with a selected patient subgroup or with another agent. To support such efforts, it is useful to clarify the distinctions between the terms and the mathematical models used in analyzing combinations. To incorporate molecular disease classifications, the familiar concept of the therapeutic window is modified to define a pharmacogenetic window, which is an unambiguous numerical measure of the magnitude of interaction produced by a combination, and to define a test of pharmacogenetic synergy. In contrast, certain common comparative methods, such as vertical windows (comparing effects at a given dose) and animal models of mutational targets may be dominated by undesirable features. Although this discussion is oriented towards cancer therapy, an extension of these concepts to other comparative biologic assays is feasible and advisable.
单一治疗药物在未经过筛选的患者中常常疗效不佳。因此,将一种药物与特定的患者亚组或另一种药物联合使用是很常见的做法。为了支持此类研究,明确分析联合用药时所使用的术语和数学模型之间的区别是很有必要的。为了纳入分子疾病分类,对治疗窗这一常见概念进行了修改,以定义一个药物遗传学窗口,它是联合用药所产生相互作用强度的明确数值度量,并定义了一种药物遗传学协同作用的测试方法。相比之下,某些常见的比较方法,如垂直窗口(比较给定剂量下的效应)和突变靶点的动物模型,可能存在一些不良特性。尽管本讨论主要针对癌症治疗,但将这些概念扩展到其他比较生物学检测中是可行且可取的。