Muldoon Kathleen M, Simons Elwyn L
Department of Anthropology, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA 01003, USA.
Am J Phys Anthropol. 2007 Oct;134(2):152-61. doi: 10.1002/ajpa.20651.
Variation in body size is well documented for both extant and extinct Malagasy primates, and appears to be correlated with geographic patterns of resource seasonality. Less attention has been paid to extant lemurs in subfossil collections, although it has been suggested that subfossil forms of extant species are characterized by greater size than their modern counterpart. This trend of phyletic size change has been related to climate change, habitat fragmentation, or human hunting. However, space- and time-averaging in the subfossil samples of previous studies may have obscured more general ecogeographic patterns underlying these size differences. Our objective is to examine size variation in subfossil still-extant primates within a regional comparative context to determine if subfossil and living forms conform to similar ecogeographic patterns. We report on the subfossil still-extant primate assemblage from Ankilitelo, southwestern Madagascar (approximately 500 yr BP) to test this hypothesis. The Ankilitelo primates were compared with museum specimens of known locality. Extant taxa were assigned to one of five distinct ecogeographic regions, including spiny thicket, dry deciduous forest, succulent woodland, lowland and subhumid rainforest. Comparisons of tooth size in extant lemurs reveal significant geographical patterns of variation within genera. In general, the primates from Ankilitelo are indeed larger than their modern counterpart. However, these differences fit an ecoregional model of size variation, whereby Ankilitelo species are comparable in size to living forms inhabiting ecoregions present near the cave today. This suggests that Malagasy primates have been subjected to similar patterns of resource seasonality for at least 500 years.
马达加斯加现存和已灭绝的灵长类动物的体型差异已有充分记载,且似乎与资源季节性的地理模式相关。尽管有人提出现存物种的亚化石形态比其现代对应形态体型更大,但亚化石收藏中现存狐猴受到的关注较少。这种系统发育体型变化的趋势与气候变化、栖息地破碎化或人类捕猎有关。然而,以往研究中亚化石样本的时空平均化可能掩盖了这些体型差异背后更普遍的生态地理模式。我们的目标是在区域比较的背景下研究亚化石中仍现存的灵长类动物的体型差异,以确定亚化石形态和现存形态是否符合相似的生态地理模式。我们报告了来自马达加斯加西南部安基利特洛(约公元1500年)的亚化石中仍现存的灵长类动物组合,以检验这一假设。将安基利特洛的灵长类动物与已知产地的博物馆标本进行了比较。现存分类群被归为五个不同的生态地理区域之一,包括多刺灌丛、干燥落叶林、肉质林地、低地和亚湿润雨林。对现存狐猴牙齿大小的比较揭示了属内显著的地理变异模式。一般来说,来自安基利特洛的灵长类动物确实比其现代对应形态更大。然而,这些差异符合体型变异的生态区域模型,即安基利特洛的物种在体型上与现今洞穴附近存在的生态区域中栖息的现存形态相当。这表明马达加斯加的灵长类动物至少在500年内一直受到类似的资源季节性模式的影响。