Suppr超能文献

与退伍军人事务部门诊物质使用治疗相关的医疗服务使用模式。

Patterns of health services use associated with Veterans Affairs outpatient substance-use treatment.

作者信息

Stecker Tracy, Curran Geoffrey M, Han Xiaotong, Booth Brenda M

机构信息

Veterans Affairs Health Services Research and Development, Center for Mental Health and Outcomes Research, Central Arkansas Veterans Healthcare System, 152/NLR, 2200 Fort Roots Drive, North Little Rock, Arkansas 72114, USA.

出版信息

J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2007 Jul;68(4):510-8. doi: 10.15288/jsad.2007.68.510.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study examined service use and costs associated with receiving intensive outpatient (IOP) substance-use treatment.

METHOD

Veterans Affairs national databases were used to identify all veterans receiving IOP substance-use treatment in fiscal year (FY) 1999. Changes in the use of health services (2 years pretreatment compared with 2 years posttreatment) were examined. Three IOP treatment groups were defined: (1) veterans attending 1-5 IOP visits (n=2,384), (2) 6-14 IOP visits (n=2,940), and (3) >or= 15 IOP visits (n=3,005). In addition, a demographically matched no-treatment group was defined as veterans in primary care with a substance-use diagnosis and no substance-use treatment in FY 1999 (n = 7,328). General medical, psychiatric, and substance-use encounters in inpatient and outpatient settings were retrieved for the 4 years. Generalized estimating equations analyses were used to compare changes in service use across the three IOP groups controlling for demographic characteristics and comorbidity.

RESULTS

Total outpatient visits increased in all three treatment groups after IOP, with the largest increase observed in the group with >or= 15 visits (mean visits = 5, 44, and 57, respectively). In comparison, total visits decreased in the no-treatment group (-7). This pattern was similar across settings (general medical, psychiatric, and substance use). Total inpatient days decreased among the four groups, with the no-treatment group having the least amount of decrease (mean change in days = .34, .32, .18, and .03, respectively). Analysis of cost data showed similar findings.

CONCLUSIONS

Results indicated that more intense IOP treatment is associated with increases in subsequent psychiatric, substance-use, medical, and total outpatient care and decreases in expensive inpatient care.

摘要

目的

本研究调查了接受强化门诊(IOP)物质使用治疗的服务利用情况及相关费用。

方法

利用退伍军人事务部的全国数据库,确定1999财年所有接受IOP物质使用治疗的退伍军人。研究了健康服务利用情况的变化(治疗前2年与治疗后2年相比)。定义了三个IOP治疗组:(1)参加1 - 5次IOP就诊的退伍军人(n = 2384),(2)参加6 - 14次IOP就诊的退伍军人(n = 2940),以及(3)≥15次IOP就诊的退伍军人(n = 3005)。此外,将一个人口统计学匹配的未治疗组定义为1999财年在初级保健中被诊断为物质使用但未接受物质使用治疗的退伍军人(n = 7328)。检索了这4年中住院和门诊环境下的一般医疗、精神科和物质使用诊疗记录。使用广义估计方程分析来比较三个IOP组在控制人口统计学特征和合并症情况下服务利用的变化。

结果

在IOP治疗后,所有三个治疗组的门诊就诊总数均增加,其中≥15次就诊组的增加幅度最大(平均就诊次数分别为5、44和57)。相比之下,未治疗组的就诊总数减少了(-7)。这种模式在不同环境(一般医疗、精神科和物质使用)中相似。四个组的住院总天数均减少,未治疗组的减少量最少(天数的平均变化分别为0.34、0.32、0.18和0.03)。成本数据分析显示了类似的结果。

结论

结果表明,更强化的IOP治疗与随后精神科、物质使用、医疗及门诊总护理的增加以及昂贵的住院护理的减少相关。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验