• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

西澳大利亚关于公众对电休克疗法的态度及了解情况的一项调查。

A Western Australian survey on public attitudes toward and knowledge of electroconvulsive therapy.

作者信息

Teh Serene P C, Helmes Edward, Drake Deidre G

机构信息

Department of Justice, Western Australia.

出版信息

Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2007 May;53(3):247-73. doi: 10.1177/0020764006074522.

DOI:10.1177/0020764006074522
PMID:17569409
Abstract

AIMS

Healthcare professionals have debated the use and effects of electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) for more than 65 years. Yet, knowledge about, and attitudes towards, ECT have not been thoroughly researched within the Australian community. This study focused on a Western Australian perspective on these issues.

METHOD

The objectives were achieved with specifically developed questionnaires. Six hundred surveys were distributed across the metropolitan area of Perth, Australia.

RESULTS

A total of 379 completed questionnaires indicated that more than 60% of respondents had some knowledge about the main aspects of ECT. Participants were generally opposed to the use of ECT on individuals with psychosocial issues, on children and on involuntary patients. Public perceptions of ECT were also found to be mainly negative.

CONCLUSION

The findings suggest that clinicians should ensure that individuals recommended for ECT are knowledgeable about basic ECT processes and implications in order to ensure their full informed consent.

摘要

目的

超过65年来,医疗保健专业人员一直在争论电休克疗法(ECT)的使用及效果。然而,澳大利亚社区内对于ECT的了解和态度尚未得到充分研究。本研究聚焦于西澳大利亚州对这些问题的看法。

方法

通过专门设计的问卷实现研究目标。在澳大利亚珀斯的大都市区发放了600份调查问卷。

结果

总共379份填写完整的问卷表明,超过60%的受访者对ECT的主要方面有一定了解。参与者普遍反对对有心理社会问题的个体、儿童和非自愿患者使用ECT。还发现公众对ECT的看法主要是负面的。

结论

研究结果表明,临床医生应确保推荐接受ECT治疗的个体了解ECT的基本过程和影响,以确保他们能完全知情同意。

相似文献

1
A Western Australian survey on public attitudes toward and knowledge of electroconvulsive therapy.西澳大利亚关于公众对电休克疗法的态度及了解情况的一项调查。
Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2007 May;53(3):247-73. doi: 10.1177/0020764006074522.
2
Knowledge of and attitudes toward electroconvulsive therapy among medical students, psychology students, and the general public.医学生、心理学学生和普通公众对电抽搐治疗的认识和态度。
J ECT. 2013 Mar;29(1):45-50. doi: 10.1097/YCT.0b013e31826c9f05.
3
Public attitudes towards electroconvulsive therapy in the Chuvash Republic.公众对楚瓦什共和国电抽搐疗法的态度。
Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2012 May;58(3):289-94. doi: 10.1177/0020764010394282. Epub 2011 Feb 21.
4
Knowledge and attitudes regarding electroconvulsive therapy among medical students and the general public.医学生和普通公众对电休克治疗的认知与态度。
J ECT. 2008 Dec;24(4):244-53. doi: 10.1097/YCT.0b013e318168be4a.
5
Electroconvulsive Therapy: The Impact of a Brief Educational Intervention on Public Knowledge and Attitudes.电休克治疗:简短教育干预对公众知识和态度的影响。
Int Q Community Health Educ. 2018 Jan;38(2):129-136. doi: 10.1177/0272684X17749939. Epub 2017 Dec 25.
6
Electroconvulsive therapy in adolescents: experience, knowledge, and attitudes of recipients.青少年的电休克治疗:接受者的经验、知识和态度
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 1999 May;38(5):594-9. doi: 10.1097/00004583-199905000-00022.
7
[The public's attitudes towards electroconvulsive therapy in Hungary].[匈牙利公众对电休克疗法的态度]
Ideggyogy Sz. 2020 Sep 30;73(9-10):311-316. doi: 10.18071/isz.73.0311.
8
Hungarian medical students' knowledge about and attitudes toward electroconvulsive therapy.匈牙利医科学生对电休克治疗的了解及态度
J ECT. 2005 Jun;21(2):96-9. doi: 10.1097/01.yct.0000165502.06410.d7.
9
Experience, knowledge and attitudes of child psychiatrists regarding electroconvulsive therapy in the young.儿童精神科医生对青少年电休克治疗的经验、知识和态度。
Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 1997 Oct;31(5):676-81. doi: 10.3109/00048679709062680.
10
Effects of an education training program on attitudes to electroconvulsive therapy.一项教育培训项目对电休克治疗态度的影响。
J ECT. 2007 Jun;23(2):82-8. doi: 10.1097/YCT.0b013e3180421a0a.

引用本文的文献

1
A Systematic Review of Knowledge, Attitude, and Perception Towards Electroconvulsive Therapy (ECT) in Africa.非洲对电休克治疗(ECT)的知识、态度和认知的系统评价
Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2025 Jan 13;21:67-77. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S478180. eCollection 2025.
2
The influence of prior awareness on views about psychiatric electroceutical interventions among non-clinician stakeholders.先前认知对非临床利益相关者关于精神科电治疗干预观点的影响。
Npj Ment Health Res. 2023 May 3;2(1):6. doi: 10.1038/s44184-023-00028-9.
3
Stakeholders' Ethical Concerns Regarding Psychiatric Electroceutical Interventions: Results from a US Nationwide Survey.
利益相关者对精神科电疗干预的伦理关注:来自美国全国性调查的结果。
AJOB Empir Bioeth. 2024;15(1):11-21. doi: 10.1080/23294515.2023.2224592. Epub 2023 Jun 21.
4
Views about neuromodulation interventions for depression by stakeholder group, treatment modality, and depression severity.利益相关者群体、治疗方式和抑郁严重程度对抑郁症神经调节干预的看法。
Compr Psychiatry. 2023 Apr;122:152365. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2023.152365. Epub 2023 Jan 20.
5
Assessment of beliefs and attitudes about electroconvulsive therapy posted on Twitter: An observational study.评估在 Twitter 上发布的关于电休克治疗的信仰和态度:一项观察性研究。
Eur Psychiatry. 2023 Jan 9;66(1):e11. doi: 10.1192/j.eurpsy.2022.2359.
6
A comparative study of the effect of electroconvulsive therapy and transcranial direct current stimulation in the treatment of persons suffering from treatment-resistant depression.电休克疗法与经颅直流电刺激治疗难治性抑郁症效果的对比研究
Ind Psychiatry J. 2022 Jan-Jun;31(1):68-73. doi: 10.4103/ipj.ipj_217_20. Epub 2022 Feb 3.
7
Improving attitudes toward electroconvulsive therapy.改善对电休克治疗的态度。
BJPsych Bull. 2022 Feb;46(1):4-10. doi: 10.1192/bjb.2021.5.
8
Assessment of attitudes of patients with psychiatric disorders regarding electroconvulsive therapy as a treatment option.评估精神疾病患者对电休克治疗作为一种治疗选择的态度。
Pak J Med Sci. 2020 Mar-Apr;36(3):565-568. doi: 10.12669/pjms.36.3.1637.
9
Patients', Carers', and the Public's Perspectives on Electroconvulsive Therapy.患者、护理人员及公众对电休克治疗的看法。
Front Psychiatry. 2019 May 7;10:304. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00304. eCollection 2019.