• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

迷信:关乎偏见,而非可检测性。

Superstition: a matter of bias, not detectability.

作者信息

Killeen P R

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85281, USA.

出版信息

Science. 1978 Jan 6;199(4324):88-90. doi: 10.1126/science.199.4324.88.

DOI:10.1126/science.199.4324.88
PMID:17569494
Abstract

Pigeons discriminated between stimulus changes dependent on their pecking and stimulus changes occurring independently of their behavior. Their performance was accurate, and when the payoffs for "hits" and "correct rejections" were varied, their response bias varied in a fashion similar to that of human observers detecting signals in a background of noise.

摘要

鸽子能够区分取决于其啄击行为的刺激变化和独立于其行为发生的刺激变化。它们的表现是准确的,并且当“击中”和“正确拒斥”的收益发生变化时,它们的反应偏差会以类似于人类观察者在噪声背景中检测信号的方式发生变化。

相似文献

1
Superstition: a matter of bias, not detectability.迷信:关乎偏见,而非可检测性。
Science. 1978 Jan 6;199(4324):88-90. doi: 10.1126/science.199.4324.88.
2
Superstition revisited: Sex, species, and adventitious reinforcement.再谈迷信:性别、物种与偶发强化。
Behav Processes. 2020 Jan;170:103979. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2019.103979. Epub 2019 Nov 10.
3
Theory meets pigeons: the influence of reward-magnitude on discrimination-learning.理论与鸽子:奖励幅度对辨别学习的影响。
Behav Brain Res. 2009 Mar 2;198(1):125-9. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2008.10.038. Epub 2008 Nov 8.
4
Uncertainty in pigeons.鸽子的不确定性。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2003 Sep;10(3):738-45. doi: 10.3758/bf03196540.
5
Stereotypy and intermittent reinforcement.刻板行为与间歇性强化。
Science. 1961 Jun 30;133(3470):2067-9. doi: 10.1126/science.133.3470.2067-a.
6
Suboptimal Choice in Pigeons: Stimulus Value Predicts Choice over Frequencies.鸽子的次优选择:刺激值预测对频率的选择。
PLoS One. 2016 Jul 21;11(7):e0159336. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0159336. eCollection 2016.
7
Rats are optimal in a choice task in which pigeons are not.在鸽子无法胜任的选择任务中,大鼠表现最佳。
Behav Processes. 2015 Oct;119:22-7. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2015.07.010. Epub 2015 Jul 19.
8
The paradoxical effect of low reward probabilities in suboptimal choice.次优选择中低奖励概率的矛盾效应。
J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn. 2018 Apr;44(2):180-193. doi: 10.1037/xan0000165.
9
Pigeons prefer discriminative stimuli independently of the overall probability of reinforcement and of the number of presentations of the conditioned reinforcer.鸽子偏好辨别性刺激,而与强化的总体概率以及条件性强化物的呈现次数无关。
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2012 Oct;38(4):446-52. doi: 10.1037/a0030321.
10
When is a choice not a choice? Pigeons fail to inhibit incorrect responses on a go/no-go midsession reversal task.什么时候一种选择不是选择?鸽子在进行/不进行中期反转任务时无法抑制不正确的反应。
J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn. 2015 Jul;41(3):255-65. doi: 10.1037/xan0000058. Epub 2015 Apr 27.

引用本文的文献

1
When is a causal illusion an illusion? Separating discriminability and bias in human contingency judgements.因果错觉何时成为一种错觉?区分人类偶然性判断中的可辨别性和偏差。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2024 Nov 19;78(9):17470218241293418. doi: 10.1177/17470218241293418.
2
The neuropharmacological profile of interval responding during operant tasks.操作性任务期间间隔反应的神经药理学特征。
Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol. 2024 Oct;397(10):7551-7560. doi: 10.1007/s00210-024-03155-y. Epub 2024 May 30.
3
Bridging the gap between laboratory and applied research on response-independent schedules.
弥合反应无关时间表的实验室研究与应用研究之间的差距。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2023 Jan;56(1):55-77. doi: 10.1002/jaba.965. Epub 2022 Nov 28.
4
Superstition and belief as inevitable by-products of an adaptive learning strategy.迷信和信仰是适应性学习策略不可避免的副产品。
Hum Nat. 2007 Mar;18(1):35-46. doi: 10.1007/BF02820845.
5
Adjunctive behaviors are operants.辅助行为是操作性行为。
Learn Behav. 2013 Mar;41(1):1-24. doi: 10.3758/s13420-012-0095-1.
6
A theory of behaviour on progressive ratio schedules, with applications in behavioural pharmacology.递增比例方案行为理论及其在行为药理学中的应用。
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2012 Aug;222(4):549-64. doi: 10.1007/s00213-012-2771-4. Epub 2012 Jul 3.
7
Differing views of contingencies: How contiguous?对偶然性的不同观点:有多接近?
Behav Anal. 1997 Fall;20(2):149-54. doi: 10.1007/BF03392772.
8
Contingency and behavior analysis.偶然性与行为分析
Behav Anal. 1995 Fall;18(2):209-24. doi: 10.1007/BF03392709.
9
Superstitiousness in obsessive-compulsive disorder.强迫症中的迷信行为。
Dialogues Clin Neurosci. 2010;12(2):250-4. doi: 10.31887/DCNS.2010.12.2/pbrugger.
10
Induced attack during fixed-ratio and matched-time schedules of food presentation.在固定比率和匹配时间的食物呈现时间表期间诱发攻击。
J Exp Anal Behav. 2008 Jan;89(1):31-48. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2008.89-31.