Mabry Tad M, Hanssen Arlen D
Department of Orthopedics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota 55905, USA.
J Arthroplasty. 2007 Jun;22(4 Suppl 1):56-60. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2007.02.008.
The treatment of bone deficiencies during revision knee arthroplasty remains a challenging problem. The primary treatment options for these bone deficiencies include the use of structural allografts, impaction bone grafting, and the use of prosthetic augments. There have been no comparative series demonstrating the superiority of any of these techniques. Supplemental stem fixation should be used when using one of these treatment approaches. Although the use of cementless stems is currently more popular, the available literature suggests that cemented stem fixation provides a more reliable and durable construct for revision knee arthroplasty associated with severe bone deficiency.
膝关节翻修术中骨缺损的治疗仍然是一个具有挑战性的问题。这些骨缺损的主要治疗选择包括使用结构性同种异体骨、打压植骨以及使用假体增强物。目前尚无比较系列研究证明这些技术中任何一种的优越性。在使用这些治疗方法之一时,应采用补充性柄固定。虽然目前非骨水泥柄的使用更为普遍,但现有文献表明,对于伴有严重骨缺损的膝关节翻修术,骨水泥柄固定提供了一种更可靠、更持久的结构。