Ohlmeier M D, Jahn K, Wilhelm-Gossling C, Godecke-Koch T, Hoffmann J, Seifert J, Emrich H M, Schneider U
Department of Clinical Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical School Hannover, and Center for Systems Neuroscience, Hannover, Germany.
Neuropsychobiology. 2007;55(2):81-8. doi: 10.1159/000103906. Epub 2007 Jun 15.
Atypical antipsychotics like olanzapine are more efficacious in treating negative symptoms and have less side effects. Nevertheless, important adverse effects of olanzapine are, for example, weight gain and hyperglycemia. Perazine in combination with carbamazepine has shown satisfying results in several single-schizophrenia patients, leading to the hypothesis of being equal or even superior to atypical antipsychotic monotherapy. The aim of the present study was to survey the hypothesis that perazine in combination with carbamazepine have an outcome and risk of side effects comparable to olanzapine. Eleven patients with DSM-IV schizophrenia received 14.0 +/- 5.0 mg/day olanzapine and 12 patients received 360.0 +/- 196.0 mg/day perazine in combination with 404.0 +/- 229.0 mg/day carbamazepine. Symptoms and neuropsychological state were assessed 3 times (days 0, 7, 21) using the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale and the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale. The neuropsychological state was assessed by the following neuropsychological tests: Benton, d2, ZVT, VLMT and MWT-B. Data were analyzed of variance for multiple dependent variables and repeated-measures multivariate analysis of variance. Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale and Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale scores showed superior improvement in the group receiving olanzapine. Olanzapine offers a more favorable response in positive symptoms than does perazine in combination with carbamazepine. The effect on negative symptoms is favorable in both forms of therapy and no significant differences between the groups could be determined. In both groups, treatment was associated with improved performance in cognitive tests; however, no differences were determined in the effects of the drugs. Results suggest that olanzapine offers a better response in positive symptoms than perazine in combination with carbamazepine.
像奥氮平这样的非典型抗精神病药物在治疗阴性症状方面更有效,且副作用更少。然而,奥氮平的重要不良反应包括体重增加和高血糖等。在一些单纯性精神分裂症患者中,奋乃静与卡马西平联合使用已显示出令人满意的效果,这引发了其疗效等同于甚至优于非典型抗精神病药物单一疗法的假设。本研究的目的是检验奋乃静与卡马西平联合使用在疗效和副作用风险方面与奥氮平相当的假设。11名符合《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版(DSM-IV)标准的精神分裂症患者接受了每日14.0±5.0毫克的奥氮平治疗,12名患者接受了每日360.0±196.0毫克的奋乃静与每日404.0±229.0毫克的卡马西平联合治疗。使用阳性和阴性症状量表(Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale)及简明精神病评定量表(Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale)在三个时间点(第0天、第7天、第21天)对症状和神经心理状态进行评估。通过以下神经心理测试评估神经心理状态:本顿测试(Benton)、d2测试、ZVT测试、语言学习与记忆测试(VLMT)和持续注意力测试(MWT-B)。对多个因变量进行方差分析以及重复测量多变量方差分析。阳性和阴性症状量表及简明精神病评定量表得分显示,接受奥氮平治疗的组改善更明显。与奋乃静联合卡马西平相比,奥氮平对阳性症状的反应更有利。两种治疗方式对阴性症状的效果均良好,且两组之间未发现显著差异。在两组中,治疗均与认知测试表现的改善相关;然而,未确定药物效果之间的差异。结果表明,与奋乃静联合卡马西平相比,奥氮平对阳性症状的反应更好。