Bogie Amanda Lynn, Towne Deborah, Luckett Peter M, Abramo Thomas J, Wiebe Robert A
University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK 73104, USA.
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2007 Jun;23(6):355-61. doi: 10.1097/01.pec.0000278397.63246.33.
To determine if the addition of intravenous terbutaline provides any clinical benefit to children with acute severe asthma already on continuous high-dose nebulized albuterol.
We conducted a prospective, randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled trial on pediatric patients with acute severe asthma presenting to a large inner city tertiary children's emergency department. Consecutive patients between 2 and 17 years of age who failed acute asthma management and needed intensive care unit admission underwent informed consent and were enrolled into the study. Patients not requiring intubation were randomized to receive either intravenous terbutaline or intravenous normal saline while on continuous high-dose nebulized albuterol, ipratropium bromide, and systemic corticosteroids. Outcome measures included a clinical asthma severity score, hours on continuous nebulized albuterol, and duration of stay in the pediatric intensive care unit. In addition, electrocardiograms, electrolytes, lactic acid, and troponin I levels were obtained at routine intervals during the first 24 hours after admission. Patients who significantly worsened while enrolled in the study received intravenous aminophylline according to protocol.
Forty-nine patients were enrolled in the study. Patients on terbutaline had a mean improvement in the clinical asthma severity score over the first 24 hours of 6.5 points compared with 4.8 points in the placebo group (P = 0.073). Patients on terbutaline spent 38.19 hours on continuous nebulized albuterol compared with their placebo counterparts who spent 51.93 hours (P = 0.25). The length of stay in the PICU was on average 12.95 hours longer for those patients in the placebo group as compared with the terbutaline group (P = 0.345). One patient was removed from the study for a significant cardiac dysrhythmia. This patient was in the terbutaline group and recovered without complications. Troponin I values at 12 hours and 24 hours were elevated in 3 patients each, all within the terbutaline group.
No outcome measures demonstrated statistical significance. Outcome measures revealed a trend toward improvement in the terbutaline group. Before recommending routine use of intravenous terbutaline for acute severe asthma, further study to determine safety and efficacy is necessary.
确定在已持续高剂量雾化吸入沙丁胺醇治疗的急性重度哮喘患儿中加用静脉注射特布他林是否能带来任何临床益处。
我们对一家大型市中心三级儿童急诊科收治的急性重度哮喘儿科患者进行了一项前瞻性、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验。2至17岁急性哮喘治疗失败且需要入住重症监护病房的连续患者签署知情同意书后纳入研究。不需要插管的患者在持续高剂量雾化吸入沙丁胺醇、异丙托溴铵和全身使用糖皮质激素的同时,随机接受静脉注射特布他林或静脉注射生理盐水。观察指标包括临床哮喘严重程度评分、持续雾化吸入沙丁胺醇的时长以及在儿科重症监护病房的住院时间。此外,在入院后的头24小时内定期获取心电图、电解质、乳酸和肌钙蛋白I水平。在研究过程中病情显著恶化的患者按照方案接受静脉注射氨茶碱治疗。
49名患者纳入研究。特布他林组患者在最初24小时内临床哮喘严重程度评分平均改善6.5分,而安慰剂组为4.8分(P = 0.073)。特布他林组患者持续雾化吸入沙丁胺醇的时长为38.19小时,而安慰剂组为51.93小时(P = 0.25)。安慰剂组患者在儿科重症监护病房的住院时间平均比特布他林组长12.95小时(P = 0.345)。一名患者因严重心律失常退出研究。该患者在特布他林组,康复且无并发症。特布他林组分别有3名患者在12小时和24小时时肌钙蛋白I值升高。
没有观察指标显示出统计学意义。观察指标显示特布他林组有改善趋势。在推荐常规使用静脉注射特布他林治疗急性重度哮喘之前,有必要进一步研究以确定其安全性和有效性。