Llewellyn Penny, Northway Ruth
University of Glamorgan, Pontypridd CF37 1DL, United Kingdom.
Nurse Educ Today. 2007 Nov;27(8):955-63. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2007.02.015. Epub 2007 Jun 14.
A mixed methods project [Llewellyn, P., 2005. An investigation into the advocacy role of the learning disability nurse. University of Glamorgan, unpublished PhD Thesis] investigated the advocacy role of learning disability nurses. This paper discusses the section concerned with nurses' advocacy education. Focus groups, interviews and a questionnaire survey enabled nurses from a wide range of grades, seniority and experience to explore their received education in advocacy and their educational requirements concerning their advocacy role. Findings revealed that nurses' received education in advocacy varied according to the syllabus under which they qualified, with those whose education was influenced by the 1979 Jay Report having the highest incidence of advocacy training. Many learning disability nurses who had received theoretical education did not feel confident to advocate for their clients. Many were also unsure of their ability to access independent advocacy services and when it was permissible to do this. Nurse informants expressed a need for ongoing support and training in advocacy relating to The Human Rights Act (1998) and The Disability Discrimination Act (1995); and also specifically in relation to advocacy for clients within their own work area. Most nurses had definite ideas regarding how and by whom their advocacy education and training should be provided.
一个混合方法项目[卢埃林,P.,2005年。对学习障碍护士倡导角色的调查。格拉摩根大学,未发表的博士论文]调查了学习障碍护士的倡导角色。本文讨论了与护士倡导教育相关的部分。焦点小组、访谈和问卷调查使来自不同级别、资历和经验的护士能够探讨他们所接受的倡导教育以及他们对倡导角色的教育需求。研究结果显示,护士所接受的倡导教育因他们获得资格时所依据的教学大纲而异,那些受1979年《杰伊报告》影响的教育背景的护士接受倡导培训的比例最高。许多接受过理论教育的学习障碍护士对为其客户进行倡导并不自信。许多人也不确定自己能否获得独立倡导服务以及何时可以这样做。护士受访者表示需要在与《1998年人权法案》和《1995年残疾歧视法案》相关的倡导方面持续获得支持和培训;以及特别是在其工作领域内为客户进行倡导方面。大多数护士对于应如何以及由谁提供他们的倡导教育和培训有明确的想法。