Suppr超能文献

对美国国家航空航天局任务负荷指数(NASA-TLX)工作量测量法的自我分析。

A self-analysis of the NASA-TLX workload measure.

作者信息

Noyes Jan M, Bruneau Daniel P J

机构信息

Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Bristol, 8 Woodland Road, Bristol BS8 ITN, UK.

出版信息

Ergonomics. 2007 Apr;50(4):514-9. doi: 10.1080/00140130701235232.

Abstract

Computer use and, more specifically, the administration of tests and materials online continue to proliferate. A number of subjective, self-report workload measures exist, but the National Aeronautics and Space Administration-Task Load Index (NASA-TLX) is probably the most well known and used. The aim of this paper is to consider the workload costs associated with the computer-based and paper versions of the NASA-TLX measure. It was found that there is a significant difference between the workload scores for the two media, with the computer version of the NASA-TLX incurring more workload. This has implications for the practical use of the NASA-TLX as well as for other computer-based workload measures.

摘要

计算机的使用,更具体地说,在线测试和材料管理的应用持续增多。虽然存在一些主观的自我报告工作量测量方法,但美国国家航空航天局任务负荷指数(NASA-TLX)可能是最广为人知且使用最多的。本文旨在探讨与基于计算机和纸质版的NASA-TLX测量相关的工作量成本。研究发现,两种媒介的工作量得分存在显著差异,基于计算机版的NASA-TLX产生的工作量更多。这对NASA-TLX的实际应用以及其他基于计算机的工作量测量方法都有影响。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验