试验内对照：未能重复实验在何时不构成I型错误？
Within-trial contrast: when is a failure to replicate not a type I error?
作者信息
Zentall Thomas R, Singer Rebecca A
机构信息
Department of Psychology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40506-0044, USA.
出版信息
J Exp Anal Behav. 2007 May;87(3):401-4. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2007.04-07.
Abstract
Vasconcelos, Urcuioli, and Lionello-DeNolf (2007) report the results of five experiments that fail to replicate the results of our within-trial contrast study (Clement, Feltus, Kaiser, & Zentall, 2000) and suggest that our results may represent a Type I Error. We believe that this conclusion is not warranted because (a) there is considerable evidence in support of the effect and (b) the amount of training that they gave to their pigeons prior to test may not have been sufficient to observe the effect reliably. We suggest that when sufficient training is provided, reliable contrast can be found.
摘要
瓦斯康塞洛斯、乌尔乔利和利奥内洛 - 德诺夫（2007年）报告了五项实验的结果，这些实验未能重复我们的试验内对比研究（克莱门特、费尔图斯、凯泽和曾塔尔，2000年）的结果，并表明我们的结果可能代表了第一类错误。我们认为这一结论是没有根据的，因为（a）有大量证据支持这一效应，并且（b）他们在测试前给予鸽子的训练量可能不足以可靠地观察到这一效应。我们认为，当提供足够的训练时，可以发现可靠的对比。
相似文献
1
Within-trial contrast: when is a failure to replicate not a type I error?试验内对照：未能重复实验在何时不构成I型错误？
J Exp Anal Behav. 2007 May;87(3):401-4. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2007.04-07.
2
Failure to obtain value enhancement by within-trial contrast in simultaneous and successive discriminations.在同时性和继时性辨别中，未能通过试验内对比获得价值增强。
Learn Behav. 2008 Feb;36(1):1-11. doi: 10.3758/lb.36.1.1.
3
Within-trial contrast: when you see it and when you don't.
Learn Behav. 2008 Feb;36(1):19-22; discussion 23-8. doi: 10.3758/lb.36.1.19.
4
When is a failure to replicate not a type II error?无法重复实验结果在何时不构成II类错误？
J Exp Anal Behav. 2007 May;87(3):405-7. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2007.10-07.
5
Extensive training is insufficient to produce the work-ethic effect in pigeons.大量训练不足以在鸽子身上产生职业道德效应。
J Exp Anal Behav. 2009 Jan;91(1):143-52. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2009.91-143.
6
Failure to replicate the 'work ethic" effect in pigeons.未能在鸽子身上重现“职业道德”效应。
J Exp Anal Behav. 2007 May;87(3):383-99. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2007.68-06.
7
Discriminative stimuli that follow the absence of reinforcement are preferred by pigeons over those that follow reinforcement.与强化之后出现的辨别性刺激相比，鸽子更喜欢强化缺失之后出现的辨别性刺激。
Learn Behav. 2005 Aug;33(3):337-42. doi: 10.3758/bf03192862.
8
Second-order contrast based on the expectation of effort and reinforcement.
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2002 Jan;28(1):64-74.
9
Discriminative stimuli that follow a delay have added value for pigeons.延迟后出现的辨别性刺激对鸽子具有额外价值。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2004 Oct;11(5):889-95. doi: 10.3758/bf03196717.
10
A new learning paradigm elicits fast visual discrimination in pigeons.一种新的学习范式引发鸽子快速的视觉辨别。
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2005 Apr;31(2):237-46. doi: 10.1037/0097-7403.31.2.237.
引用本文的文献
1
Examination of the influence of contingency on changes in reinforcer value.考察应急性对强化物价值变化的影响。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2011 Fall;44(3):543-58. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2011.44-543.
2
Within-trial contrast: The effect of probability of reinforcement in training.试验内对照：训练中强化概率的影响。
Behav Processes. 2009 Oct;82(2):126-32. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2009.05.006. Epub 2009 Jul 14.
3
Extensive training is insufficient to produce the work-ethic effect in pigeons.大量训练不足以在鸽子身上产生职业道德效应。
J Exp Anal Behav. 2009 Jan;91(1):143-52. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2009.91-143.
4
The Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior at zero, fifty, and one hundred.《行为实验分析杂志》零、五十和一百期。
J Exp Anal Behav. 2008 Jan;89(1):111-8. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2008.89-111.
5
Deprivation level and choice in pigeons: a test of within-trial contrast.鸽子的剥夺水平与选择：试内对比测试
Learn Behav. 2008 Feb;36(1):12-8. doi: 10.3758/lb.36.1.12.
6
Failure to obtain value enhancement by within-trial contrast in simultaneous and successive discriminations.在同时性和继时性辨别中，未能通过试验内对比获得价值增强。
Learn Behav. 2008 Feb;36(1):1-11. doi: 10.3758/lb.36.1.1.
7
When is a failure to replicate not a type II error?无法重复实验结果在何时不构成II类错误？
J Exp Anal Behav. 2007 May;87(3):405-7. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2007.10-07.
本文引用的文献
1
Failure to replicate the 'work ethic" effect in pigeons.未能在鸽子身上重现“职业道德”效应。
J Exp Anal Behav. 2007 May;87(3):383-99. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2007.68-06.
2
Preference for a stimulus that follows a relatively aversive event: contrast or delay reduction?对紧随相对厌恶事件之后的刺激的偏好：对比还是延迟减少？
J Exp Anal Behav. 2007 Mar;87(2):275-85. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2007.39-06.
3
State-dependent learned valuation drives choice in an invertebrate.状态依赖的学习估值驱动无脊椎动物的选择。
Science. 2006 Mar 17;311(5767):1613-5. doi: 10.1126/science.1123924.
4
Discriminative stimuli that follow the absence of reinforcement are preferred by pigeons over those that follow reinforcement.与强化之后出现的辨别性刺激相比，鸽子更喜欢强化缺失之后出现的辨别性刺激。
Learn Behav. 2005 Aug;33(3):337-42. doi: 10.3758/bf03192862.
5
Contrast and the justification of effort.对比与努力的正当理由。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2005 Apr;12(2):335-9. doi: 10.3758/bf03196381.
6
On science and the discriminative law of effect.论科学与效果的辨别法则。
J Exp Anal Behav. 2005 Jan;83(1):85-92. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2005.27-04.
7
Discriminative stimuli that follow a delay have added value for pigeons.延迟后出现的辨别性刺激对鸽子具有额外价值。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2004 Oct;11(5):889-95. doi: 10.3758/bf03196717.
8
Pigeons shift their preference toward locations of food that take more effort to obtain.鸽子会将它们的偏好转向获取难度更大的食物位置。
Behav Processes. 2004 Nov 30;67(3):405-15. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2004.07.001.
9
"Justification of effort" in rats: effects of physical and discriminative effort on reward value.
Psychol Rep. 2003 Dec;93(3 Pt 2):1095-100. doi: 10.2466/pr0.2003.93.3f.1095.
10
Spontaneous alternation behavior.自发交替行为。
Psychol Bull. 1958 Nov;55(6):412-28. doi: 10.1037/h0045446.
Zotero 插件