Suppr超能文献

护理人员参与安乐死:其哲学支持有多可靠?

Nursing involvement in euthanasia: how sound is the philosophical support?

作者信息

McCabe Helen

机构信息

Australian Catholic University, C/o Street Vincents Hospital, Darlinghurst, New South Wales, Australia.

出版信息

Nurs Philos. 2007 Jul;8(3):167-75. doi: 10.1111/j.1466-769X.2007.00312.x.

Abstract

Preference utilitarians are concerned to maximize the autonomous choices of individuals; for this reason, they argue that nurses ought to advocate for those patients who desire assistance with ending their lives. This approach prompts us to consider, then, the moral validity of nursing involvement in measures intended to end the lives of patients. In this article, the terms of preference utilitarianism are set out and considered in order to determine whether this approach offers sufficient philosophical support for sanctioning a role for nursing in euthanasia. Ultimately, it is found that preference utilitarianism is lacking in this respect, as well as in its fitness for guiding nursing activity in general. In particular, it is found that nurses are required to exchange a handmaiden relationship with the medical profession for an equally undignified relationship with patients. If nursing involvement in measures intended to end the lives of patients is to find sufficient philosophical support, then we need to look elsewhere.

摘要

偏好功利主义者关注使个人的自主选择最大化;出于这个原因,他们认为护士应该为那些希望在结束生命方面获得帮助的患者进行倡导。那么,这种方法促使我们思考护士参与旨在结束患者生命的措施的道德有效性。在本文中,阐述并考量了偏好功利主义的条件,以确定这种方法是否为认可护士在安乐死中的作用提供了充分的哲学支持。最终发现,偏好功利主义在这方面以及在总体上指导护理活动的适用性方面都存在不足。特别是,人们发现护士需要将与医疗行业的从属关系换成与患者同样有失尊严的关系。如果护士参与旨在结束患者生命的措施要找到充分的哲学支持,那么我们需要另寻他处。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验