Reno Brenda A, Fernandes Paula T, Bell Gail S, Sander Josemir W, Li Li M
Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, UNICAMP, Campinas, SP, Brazil.
Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 2007 Jun;65 Suppl 1:49-54. doi: 10.1590/s0004-282x2007001000008.
To evaluate whether an inappropriate attitude towards a person having an epileptic seizure contributes to the stigma found in society and whether an appropriate attitude helps to diminish it in the short term; to perform a long term investigation about information remembered and stigma perception after an educational lecture.
This study was performed in two steps: Step 1. Students of first year of high school of two schools in Campinas completed a questionnaire including the Stigma Scale of Epilepsy following a seizure demonstration. They were divided into three groups: a) one group had a demonstration of proper attitudes towards someone having an epileptic seizure; b) one group was shown incorrect procedures; c) control group. After the completion of the questionnaire, an educational lecture about epilepsy was given. Step 2: six months later, the questionnaire was re-administered.
The comparison between the four groups (step 1 and step 2) show a significant difference (Anova (3,339)=2.77; p=0.042). Pairwise comparison using Fisher's Least-Significant-Difference Test showed a significant difference between the group shown incorrect procedures (step 1) versus step 2, and the control group (step 1) versus step 2, but no difference between the group shown correct procedures (step 1) versus step 2.
Exhibiting proper attitudes towards a person experiencing an epileptic seizure may cause significant differences among the subjects degrees of stigma towards people with epilepsy. It is therefore fundamental that there should be de-stigmatization campaigns provided, to correct information and provide appropriate education.
评估对癫痫发作患者的不当态度是否会导致社会中存在的污名化现象,以及恰当的态度是否有助于在短期内减少这种污名化;对一次教育讲座后所记住的信息和污名认知进行长期调查。
本研究分两个步骤进行:步骤1. 坎皮纳斯两所学校的高一学生在观看一次癫痫发作演示后,完成一份包括癫痫污名量表的问卷。他们被分为三组:a)一组观看了对癫痫发作患者的正确态度演示;b)一组观看了错误的处理程序;c)对照组。问卷完成后,进行了一场关于癫痫的教育讲座。步骤2:六个月后,重新发放问卷。
四组(步骤1和步骤2)之间的比较显示出显著差异(方差分析(3,339)=2.77;p = 0.042)。使用Fisher最小显著差检验的成对比较显示,观看错误处理程序的组(步骤1)与步骤2之间,以及对照组(步骤1)与步骤2之间存在显著差异,但观看正确程序的组(步骤1)与步骤2之间没有差异。
对癫痫发作患者表现出恰当的态度可能会使受试者对癫痫患者的污名化程度产生显著差异。因此,开展消除污名化运动、纠正信息并提供适当教育至关重要。