Suppr超能文献

阿立哌唑作为重度抑郁症辅助治疗的疗效与安全性:一项多中心、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照研究

The efficacy and safety of aripiprazole as adjunctive therapy in major depressive disorder: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.

作者信息

Berman Robert M, Marcus Ronald N, Swanink René, McQuade Robert D, Carson William H, Corey-Lisle Patricia K, Khan Arif

机构信息

Bristol-Myers Squibb Co., Wallingford, Conn. 06492, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Psychiatry. 2007 Jun;68(6):843-53. doi: 10.4088/jcp.v68n0604.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess the efficacy and safety of aripiprazole versus placebo as adjunctive treatment to standard antidepressant therapy (ADT) in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) who showed an incomplete response to 1 prospective and 1 to 3 historical courses of ADT within the current episode.

METHOD

The study comprised a 7- to 28-day screening phase, an 8-week prospective treatment phase, and a 6-week double-blind treatment phase. Patients with DSM-IV-TR-defined MDD were enrolled between June 16, 2004, and April 27, 2006. During prospective treatment, patients received ADT: escitalopram, fluoxetine, paroxetine controlled-release, sertraline, or venlafaxine extended-release, each with single-blind, adjunctive placebo. Incomplete responders continued ADT and were randomly assigned to double-blind, adjunctive placebo or adjunctive aripiprazole (2-15 mg/day with fluoxetine or paroxetine; 2-20 mg/day with all others). The primary efficacy endpoint was the mean change from end of prospective treatment to end of double-blind treatment (week 14, last observation carried forward) in Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) total score (analysis of covariance).

RESULTS

A total of 178 patients were randomly assigned to adjunctive placebo and 184 to adjunctive aripiprazole. Baseline demographics were similar between groups (mean MADRS total score of 26.0). Mean change in MADRS total score was significantly greater with adjunctive aripiprazole (-8.8) than adjunctive placebo (-5.8; p < .001). Adverse events (AEs) that occurred in > or = 10% of patients with adjunctive placebo or adjunctive aripiprazole were akathisia (4.5% vs. 23.1%), headache (10.8% vs. 6.0%), and restlessness (3.4% vs. 14.3%). Discontinuations due to AEs were low with adjunctive placebo (1.7%) and adjunctive aripiprazole (2.2%); only 1 adjunctive aripiprazole-treated patient discontinued due to akathisia.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with MDD who showed an incomplete response to ADT, adjunctive aripiprazole was efficacious and well tolerated.

CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT00095823.

摘要

目的

评估阿立哌唑与安慰剂作为辅助治疗手段,用于当前发作期对1个前瞻性疗程和1至3个既往疗程的标准抗抑郁治疗(ADT)反应不完全的重度抑郁症(MDD)患者的疗效和安全性。

方法

该研究包括一个为期7至28天的筛查阶段、一个为期8周的前瞻性治疗阶段和一个为期6周的双盲治疗阶段。符合《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版(DSM-IV-TR)定义的MDD患者于2004年6月16日至2006年4月27日入组。在前瞻性治疗期间,患者接受ADT:艾司西酞普兰、氟西汀、控释帕罗西汀、舍曲林或缓释文拉法辛,每种药物均联合单盲安慰剂。反应不完全者继续接受ADT,并被随机分配接受双盲安慰剂或阿立哌唑辅助治疗(与氟西汀或帕罗西汀联合使用时剂量为2 - 15毫克/天;与其他药物联合使用时剂量为2 - 20毫克/天)。主要疗效终点是蒙哥马利-艾斯伯格抑郁量表(MADRS)总分从前瞻性治疗结束到双盲治疗结束(第14周,末次观察值结转)的平均变化(协方差分析)。

结果

共178例患者被随机分配接受安慰剂辅助治疗,184例接受阿立哌唑辅助治疗。两组的基线人口统计学特征相似(MADRS总分平均为26.0)。阿立哌唑辅助治疗组的MADRS总分平均变化(-8.8)显著大于安慰剂辅助治疗组(-5.8;p <.001)。接受安慰剂辅助治疗或阿立哌唑辅助治疗的患者中,发生率≥10%的不良事件有静坐不能(4.5%对23.1%)、头痛(10.8%对6.0%)和烦躁不安(3.4%对14.3%)。因不良事件停药的比例在安慰剂辅助治疗组较低(1.7%),在阿立哌唑辅助治疗组也较低(2.2%);仅1例接受阿立哌唑辅助治疗的患者因静坐不能停药。

结论

对于对ADT反应不完全的MDD患者,阿立哌唑辅助治疗有效且耐受性良好。

临床试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov标识符NCT00095823。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验