Is compulsory court-annexed medical malpractice arbitration constitutional? How the debate reflects a trends towards compulsion in alternative dispute resolution.
作者信息
Parrott Matthew
出版信息
Fordham Law Rev. 2007 Apr;75(5):2685-743.
PMID:17593587
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Is compulsory court-annexed medical malpractice arbitration constitutional? How the debate reflects a trends towards compulsion in alternative dispute resolution.
Fordham Law Rev. 2007 Apr;75(5):2685-743.
2
Alternative dispute resolution. The court of first resort.
Minn Med. 2002 Jan;85(1):43-7.
3
Considerations for implementing pre-dispute arbitration agreements in provider contracts.
J Healthc Risk Manag. 2008;28(1):19-26. doi: 10.1002/jhrm.5600280104.
4
Litigation and legislation. Arbitration agreement.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2014 Sep;146(3):399-401. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2014.06.006.
5
The practice of mediation to resolve clinical, bioethical, and medical malpractice disputes.
Hong Kong Med J. 2015 Dec;21(6):560-4. doi: 10.12809/hkmj154615.
6
Medical malpractice. An historical perspective.
N J Med. 2003 Jul-Aug;100(7-8):21-5.
7
Medical Malpractice Reform--Historical Approaches, Alternative Models, and Communication and Resolution Programs.
AMA J Ethics. 2016 Mar 1;18(3):299-310. doi: 10.1001/journalofethics.2016.18.3.pfor6-1603.
8
Malpractice in radiation oncology: redefining the role of the medical expert.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2005 Mar 1;61(3):638-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2004.10.041.
9
Is high-low arbitration worth it?
Med Econ. 2007 Jun 1;84(11):28.
10
Doctors, the adversary system, and procedural reform in medical liability litigation.
Fordham Law Rev. 2004 Mar;72(4):943-1016.
Zotero 插件